名稱: Detection of Error Condition Without Action

The product detects a specific error, but takes no actions to handle the error.

一般資訊

引入方式

Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.

適用平台

程式語言

類別： Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

常見後果

範圍	影響	可能性
Integrity Other	Varies by Context, Unexpected State, Alter Execution Logic 注意：An attacker could utilize an ignored error condition to place the system in an unexpected state that could lead to the execution of unintended logic and could cause other unintended behavior.

觀察到的案例

參考資料	描述
CVE-2022-21820	A GPU data center manager detects an error due to a malformed request but does not act on it, leading to memory corruption.

潛在緩解措施

Phases : Implementation
Properly handle each exception. This is the recommended solution. Ensure that all exceptions are handled in such a way that you can be sure of the state of your system at any given moment.
Phases : Implementation
If a function returns an error, it is important to either fix the problem and try again, alert the user that an error has happened and let the program continue, or alert the user and close and cleanup the program.
Phases : Testing
Subject the product to extensive testing to discover some of the possible instances of where/how errors or return values are not handled. Consider testing techniques such as ad hoc, equivalence partitioning, robustness and fault tolerance, mutation, and fuzzing.

偵測方法

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有效性 : High

漏洞對應備注

理由說明 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
備註 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

參考資料

REF-18

The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf

REF-44

24 Deadly Sins of Software Security
Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega.

REF-1534

Automated Technical Debt Measure, Version 2
OMG.
https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM2/1.0/PDF

提交

名稱	機構	日期	發布日期	Version
CLASP		2006-07-19 +00:00	2006-07-19 +00:00	Draft 3

修改記錄

名稱	機構	日期	備註
Eric Dalci	Cigital	2008-07-01 +00:00	updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-09-08 +00:00	updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-11-24 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2009-03-10 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2009-07-27 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-01 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-27 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-09-13 +00:00	updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2012-05-11 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-02-18 +00:00	updated Related_Attack_Patterns
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-07-30 +00:00	updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2017-11-08 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-01-03 +00:00	updated Related_Attack_Patterns, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-02-24 +00:00	updated References, Type
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-08-20 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-01-31 +00:00	updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-04-27 +00:00	updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-06-29 +00:00	updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-10-26 +00:00	updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2024-02-29 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2025-12-11 +00:00	updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2026-10-28 +00:00	updated References

CWE-390 詳細資料

CWE-390