名稱: Missing Default Case in Multiple Condition Expression

The code does not have a default case in an expression with multiple conditions, such as a switch statement.

一般資訊

引入方式

Implementation

適用平台

程式語言

名稱： C (Undetermined)
名稱： C++ (Undetermined)
名稱： Java (Undetermined)
名稱： C# (Undetermined)
名稱： Python (Undetermined)
名稱： JavaScript (Undetermined)

常見後果

範圍	影響	可能性
Integrity	Varies by Context, Alter Execution Logic 注意：If a multiple-condition expression (such as a switch in C) omits the default case but does not consider or handle all possible values that could occur, then this might lead to complex logical errors and resultant weaknesses. Because of this, further decisions are made based on poor information, and cascading failure results. Depending on the context in which the expression is used, any consequences may result: e.g., issues of confidentiality, authentication, authorization, availability, integrity, accountability, or non-repudiation.

潛在緩解措施

Phases : Implementation
Ensure that there are no cases unaccounted for when adjusting program flow or values based on the value of a given variable. In the case of switch style statements, the very simple act of creating a default case can, if done correctly, mitigate this situation. Often however, the default case is used simply to represent an assumed option, as opposed to working as a check for invalid input. This is poor practice and in some cases is as bad as omitting a default case entirely.

偵測方法

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有效性 : High

漏洞對應備注

理由說明 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
備註 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

參考資料

REF-18

The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf

REF-62

The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.

REF-1534

Automated Technical Debt Measure, Version 2
OMG.
https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM2/1.0/PDF

提交

名稱	機構	日期	發布日期	Version
CLASP		2006-07-19 +00:00	2006-07-19 +00:00	Draft 3

修改記錄

名稱	機構	日期	備註
Eric Dalci	Cigital	2008-07-01 +00:00	updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2008-09-08 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2009-05-27 +00:00	updated Description, Name
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2010-06-21 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-03-29 +00:00	updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-01 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2011-06-27 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2012-05-11 +00:00	updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-06-23 +00:00	updated Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2014-07-30 +00:00	updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2017-11-08 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2018-03-27 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2019-01-03 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-02-24 +00:00	updated References, Relationships, Type
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2020-08-20 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2022-10-13 +00:00	updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-04-27 +00:00	updated Detection_Factors, Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2023-06-29 +00:00	updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2025-12-11 +00:00	updated Relationships
CWE Content Team	MITRE	2026-10-28 +00:00	updated Common_Consequences, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, References

CWE-478 詳細資料

CWE-478