CVE-2005-4206 : Details

CVE-2005-4206

6.1
/
Mittel
A01-Broken Access Control
5.94%V4
Network
2005-12-13
16h00 +00:00
2025-01-16
19h48 +00:00
Benachrichtigungen für ein CVE
Bleiben Sie über alle Änderungen zu einem bestimmten CVE informiert.
Benachrichtigungen verwalten

CVE-Beschreibungen

Blackboard Learning and Community Portal System in Academic Suite 6.3.1.424, 6.2.3.23, and other versions before 6 allows remote attackers to redirect users to other URLs and conduct phishing attacks via a modified url parameter to frameset.jsp, which loads the URL into a frame and causes it to appear to be part of a valid page.

CVE-Informationen

Verwandte Schwachstellen

CWE-ID Name der Schwachstelle Source
CWE-601 URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.

Metriken

Metriken Score Schweregrad CVSS Vektor Source
V3.1 6.1 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Changed

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

Low

There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

Low

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 4 AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS ist ein Bewertungsmodell, das die Wahrscheinlichkeit vorhersagt, dass eine Schwachstelle ausgenutzt wird.

EPSS-Score

Das EPSS-Modell liefert einen Wahrscheinlichkeitswert zwischen 0 und 1 (0 und 100%). Je höher der Score, desto größer die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass eine Schwachstelle ausgenutzt wird.

EPSS-Perzentil

Das Perzentil wird verwendet, um CVEs nach ihrem EPSS-Score zu ranken. Ein CVE im 95. Perzentil gemäß seinem EPSS-Score ist beispielsweise mit größerer Wahrscheinlichkeit ausnutzbar als 95% der anderen CVEs. Das Perzentil dient somit zum Vergleich des EPSS-Scores eines CVEs mit dem anderer CVEs.

Exploit-Informationen

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 26778

Veröffentlichungsdatum : 2005-12-11 23h00 +00:00
Autor : dr_insane
EDB-Verifiziert : Yes

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Blackboard>>Academic_suite >> Version To (including) 6.0.0.0

Blackboard>>Academic_suite >> Version 6.2.3.23

Blackboard>>Academic_suite >> Version 6.3.1.424

Referenzen

http://secunia.com/advisories/17991
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://www.osvdb.org/21618
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_OSVDB
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15814
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID