CVE-2011-4107 : Details

CVE-2011-4107

6.5
/
Mittel
A05-Security Misconfiguration
12.43%V4
Network
2011-11-17
19h00 +00:00
2024-08-07
00h01 +00:00
Benachrichtigungen für ein CVE
Bleiben Sie über alle Änderungen zu einem bestimmten CVE informiert.
Benachrichtigungen verwalten

CVE-Beschreibungen

The simplexml_load_string function in the XML import plug-in (libraries/import/xml.php) in phpMyAdmin 3.4.x before 3.4.7.1 and 3.3.x before 3.3.10.5 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via XML data containing external entity references, aka an XML external entity (XXE) injection attack.

CVE-Informationen

Verwandte Schwachstellen

CWE-ID Name der Schwachstelle Source
CWE-611 Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference
The product processes an XML document that can contain XML entities with URIs that resolve to documents outside of the intended sphere of control, causing the product to embed incorrect documents into its output.

Metriken

Metriken Score Schweregrad CVSS Vektor Source
V3.1 6.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS ist ein Bewertungsmodell, das die Wahrscheinlichkeit vorhersagt, dass eine Schwachstelle ausgenutzt wird.

EPSS-Score

Das EPSS-Modell liefert einen Wahrscheinlichkeitswert zwischen 0 und 1 (0 und 100%). Je höher der Score, desto größer die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass eine Schwachstelle ausgenutzt wird.

EPSS-Perzentil

Das Perzentil wird verwendet, um CVEs nach ihrem EPSS-Score zu ranken. Ein CVE im 95. Perzentil gemäß seinem EPSS-Score ist beispielsweise mit größerer Wahrscheinlichkeit ausnutzbar als 95% der anderen CVEs. Das Perzentil dient somit zum Vergleich des EPSS-Scores eines CVEs mit dem anderer CVEs.

Exploit-Informationen

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 18371

Veröffentlichungsdatum : 2012-01-13 23h00 +00:00
Autor : Marco Batista
EDB-Verifiziert : No

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Phpmyadmin>>Phpmyadmin >> Version From (including) 3.3.0.0 To (excluding) 3.3.10.5

Phpmyadmin>>Phpmyadmin >> Version From (including) 3.4.0.0 To (excluding) 3.4.7.1

Configuraton 0

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 14

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 15

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 16

Configuraton 0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 5.0

Referenzen

http://secunia.com/advisories/46447
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
http://osvdb.org/76798
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_OSVDB
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/03/5
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Nov/21
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC
http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2391
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/50497
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:198
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8533
Tags : third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SREASON
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/03/3
Tags : mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST