Einführungsmodi
Implementation
Anwendbare Plattformen
Sprache
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Technologien
Class: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)
Häufige Konsequenzen
| Bereich |
Auswirkung |
Wahrscheinlichkeit |
Availability Integrity | Unexpected State, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Note: An unexpected return value could place the system in a state that could lead to a crash or other unintended behaviors. | |
Beobachtete Beispiele
| Referenzen |
Beschreibung |
| Chain: function in web caching proxy does not correctly check a return value (CWE-253) leading to a reachable assertion (CWE-617) |
Mögliche Gegenmaßnahmen
Phases : Architecture and Design
Use a language or compiler that uses exceptions and requires the catching of those exceptions.
Phases : Implementation
Properly check all functions which return a value.
Phases : Implementation
When designing any function make sure you return a value or throw an exception in case of an error.
Erkennungsmethoden
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Wirksamkeit : High
Hinweise zur Schwachstellen-Zuordnung
Begründung : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Kommentar : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Referenzen
REF-62
The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
Einreichung
| Name |
Organisation |
Datum |
Veröffentlichungsdatum |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Änderungen
| Name |
Organisation |
Datum |
Kommentar |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-24 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-03-10 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Demonstrative_Examples, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-06-23 +00:00 |
updated Description, Other_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-02-29 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Weakness_Ordinalities |