CWE-841 Details

CWE-841

Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow
Incomplete
2011-03-30
00h00 +00:00
2025-12-11
00h00 +00:00
Benachrichtigungen für ein CWE
Bleiben Sie über alle Änderungen zu einem bestimmten CWE informiert.
Benachrichtigungen verwalten

Name: Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow

The product supports a session in which more than one behavior must be performed by an actor, but it does not properly ensure that the actor performs the behaviors in the required sequence.

Allgemeine Informationen

Einführungsmodi

Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.

Anwendbare Plattformen

Sprache

Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Häufige Konsequenzen

Bereich Auswirkung Wahrscheinlichkeit
OtherAlter Execution Logic

Note: An attacker could cause the product to skip critical steps or perform them in the wrong order, bypassing its intended business logic. This can sometimes have security implications.

Beobachtete Beispiele

Referenzen Beschreibung

CVE-2011-0348

Bypass of access/billing restrictions by sending traffic to an unrestricted destination before sending to a restricted destination.

CVE-2007-3012

Attacker can access portions of a restricted page by canceling out of a dialog.

CVE-2009-5056

Ticket-tracking system does not enforce a permission setting.

CVE-2004-2164

Shopping cart does not close a database connection when user restores a previous order, leading to connection exhaustion.

CVE-2003-0777

Chain: product does not properly handle dropped connections, leading to missing NULL terminator (CWE-170) and segmentation fault.

CVE-2005-3327

Chain: Authentication bypass by skipping the first startup step as required by the protocol.

CVE-2004-0829

Chain: File server crashes when sent a "find next" request without an initial "find first."

CVE-2010-2620

FTP server allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending (1) LIST, (2) RETR, (3) STOR, or other commands without performing the required login steps first.

CVE-2005-3296

FTP server allows remote attackers to list arbitrary directories as root by running the LIST command before logging in.

Erkennungsmethoden

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Hinweise zur Schwachstellen-Zuordnung

Begründung : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Kommentar : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Hinweise


Referenzen

REF-795

Business Logic Flaws and Yahoo Games
Jeremiah Grossman.
https://blog.jeremiahgrossman.com/2006/12/business-logic-flaws.html

REF-796

Seven Business Logic Flaws That Put Your Website At Risk
Jeremiah Grossman.
https://docplayer.net/10021793-Seven-business-logic-flaws-that-put-your-website-at-risk.html

REF-797

Business Logic Flaws
WhiteHat Security.
https://web.archive.org/web/20080720171327/http://www.whitehatsec.com/home/solutions/BL_auction.html

REF-806

Insufficient Process Validation
WASC.
http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/13246943/Insufficient-Process-Validation

REF-799

Defying Logic: Theory, Design, and Implementation of Complex Systems for Testing Application Logic
Rafal Los, Prajakta Jagdale.
https://www.slideshare.net/RafalLos/defying-logic-business-logic-testing-with-automation

REF-667

Real-Life Example of a 'Business Logic Defect' (Screen Shots!)
Rafal Los.
http://h30501.www3.hp.com/t5/Following-the-White-Rabbit-A/Real-Life-Example-of-a-Business-Logic-Defect-Screen-Shots/ba-p/22581

REF-801

Toward Automated Detection of Logic Vulnerabilities in Web Applications
Viktoria Felmetsger, Ludovico Cavedon, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna.
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec10/tech/full_papers/Felmetsger.pdf

REF-802

Designing a Framework Method for Secure Business Application Logic Integrity in e-Commerce Systems
Faisal Nabi.
http://ijns.femto.com.tw/contents/ijns-v12-n1/ijns-2011-v12-n1-p29-41.pdf

Einreichung

Name Organisation Datum Veröffentlichungsdatum Version
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-03-24 +00:00 2011-03-30 +00:00 1.12

Änderungen

Name Organisation Datum Kommentar
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-27 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-10-28 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2022-04-28 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated References, Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Relationships, Type, Weakness_Ordinalities