CWE-215 상세 정보

CWE-215

Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
특정 CWE 알림
특정 CWE의 변경 사항에 대한 정보를 받아보세요.
알림 관리

이름: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code

The product inserts sensitive information into debugging code.

일반 정보

취약점 도입 방식

Array : When debugging, it may be necessary to report detailed information to the programmer. However, if the debugging code is not disabled when the product is operating in a production environment, then this sensitive information may be exposed to attackers.

적용 가능한 플랫폼

언어

클래스: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

일반적인 결과

범위 영향 가능성
ConfidentialityRead Application Data

참고: Sensitive information could be exposed if the debugging code is not disabled in production.

관찰된 예시

참고 자료 설명

CVE-2004-2268

Password exposed in debug information.

CVE-2002-0918

CGI script includes sensitive information in debug messages when an error is triggered.

CVE-2003-1078

FTP client with debug option enabled shows password to the screen.

잠재적 완화 방법

Phases : Implementation
Do not leave debug statements that could be executed in the source code. Ensure that all debug information is eradicated before releasing the software.
Phases : Architecture and Design

탐지 방법

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
효과성 : High

취약점 매핑 메모

근거 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
댓글 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

메모

This overlaps other categories.

제출

이름 조직 날짜 출시일 Version
PLOVER 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

수정 사항

이름 조직 날짜 댓글
Sean Eidemiller Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 added/updated demonstrative examples
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
Veracode 2008-08-15 +00:00 Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Relationship_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-05-27 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-09-27 +00:00 updated Description, Name, Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-10-30 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-06-23 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction, Type
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-12-10 +00:00 updated Potential_Mitigations
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description, Dimensions, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships