简体中文

CVE-2014-0160：详情

CVE-2014-0160

7.5
/
高危
94.46%V4
2014-04-07
00h00 +00:00
Overflow
Network
2025-10-22
00h05 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
指定 CVE 通知
随时了解指定 CVE 的变更。
管理通知

CVE 描述

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.

CVE 信息

相关弱点

CWE-ID 弱点名称 来源
CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

指标

指标 评分 严重程度 CVSS 向量 来源
V3.1 7.5 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov
V2 5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV（已知被利用漏洞）

漏洞名称 : OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability

必要措施 : Apply updates per vendor instructions.

已被用于勒索软件攻击活动 : Unknown

添加日期 : 2022-05-04 00h00 +00:00

截止日期 : 2022-05-25 00h00 +00:00

重要信息
根据 CISA KEV（已知被利用漏洞目录），此 CVE 被认定为存在漏洞且构成活跃威胁。CISA 已将该漏洞列为正被网络犯罪分子积极利用，并强调必须立即采取措施修复。请优先更新和修复此 CVE，以保护系统免遭潜在网络攻击。

EPSS

EPSS 是一种预测漏洞被利用可能性的评分模型。

EPSS 评分

EPSS 模型生成一个介于 0 到 1（即 0% 到 100%）之间的概率评分。评分越高，漏洞被利用的可能性越大。

EPSS 百分位

百分位用于根据 EPSS 评分对 CVE 进行排名。例如，EPSS 百分位为第 95 的 CVE，其被利用的可能性高于 95% 的其他 CVE。因此，百分位可用于比较不同 CVE 的 EPSS 评分。
EPSS First.org

漏洞利用信息

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32764

发布日期 : 2014-04-08 22h00 +00:00
作者 : Fitzl Csaba
EDB 已验证 : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32791

发布日期 : 2014-04-09 22h00 +00:00
作者 : prdelka
EDB 已验证 : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32998

发布日期 : 2014-04-23 22h00 +00:00
作者 : Ayman Sagy
EDB 已验证 : Yes

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 32745

发布日期 : 2014-04-07 22h00 +00:00
作者 : Jared Stafford
EDB 已验证 : Yes

相关产品

配置 0

Openssl>>Openssl >> Version 从（含） 1.0.1 至（不含） 1.0.1g

配置 0

Filezilla-project>>Filezilla_server >> Version 至（不含） 0.9.44

配置 0

Siemens>>Application_processing_engine_firmware >> Version 2.0

Siemens>>Application_processing_engine >> Version -

配置 0

Siemens>>Cp_1543-1_firmware >> Version 1.1

Siemens>>Cp_1543-1 >> Version -

配置 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500_firmware >> Version 1.5

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500 >> Version -

配置 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500t_firmware >> Version 1.5

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1500t >> Version -

配置 0

Siemens>>Elan-8.2 >> Version 至（不含） 8.3.3

Siemens>>Wincc_open_architecture >> Version 3.12

配置 0

Intellian>>V100_firmware >> Version 1.20

Intellian>>V100_firmware >> Version 1.21

Intellian>>V100_firmware >> Version 1.24

Intellian>>V100 >> Version -

配置 0

Intellian>>V60_firmware >> Version 1.15

Intellian>>V60_firmware >> Version 1.25

Intellian>>V60 >> Version -

配置 0

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 6.0

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.0

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.1

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.2

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.3

Mitel>>Micollab >> Version 7.3.0.104

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.1.2.5

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.1.3.3

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.2.0.11

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.3.2.2

Mitel>>Mivoice >> Version 1.4.0.102

配置 0

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 12.3

Opensuse>>Opensuse >> Version 13.1

配置 0

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 12.04

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 12.10

Canonical>>Ubuntu_linux >> Version 13.10

配置 0

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 19

Fedoraproject>>Fedora >> Version 20

配置 0

Redhat>>Gluster_storage >> Version 2.1

Redhat>>Storage >> Version 2.1

Redhat>>Virtualization >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_desktop >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server >> Version 6.0

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_aus >> Version 6.5

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_eus >> Version 6.5

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_server_tus >> Version 6.5

Redhat>>Enterprise_linux_workstation >> Version 6.0

配置 0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 6.0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 7.0

Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 8.0

配置 0

Ricon>>S9922l_firmware >> Version 16.10.3\(3794\)

Ricon>>S9922l >> Version 1.0

配置 0

Broadcom>>Symantec_messaging_gateway >> Version 10.6.0

Broadcom>>Symantec_messaging_gateway >> Version 10.6.1

配置 0

Splunk>>Splunk >> Version 从（含） 6.0.0 至（不含） 6.0.3

参考资料

http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/720951
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAMB3
Tags : Third Party Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57836
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57483
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://www.kerio.com/support/kerio-control/release-history
Tags : Broken Link, Third Party Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084875
Tags : Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
http://heartbleed.com/
Tags : Third Party Advisory
http://www.f-secure.com/en/web/labs_global/fsc-2014-1
Tags : Broken Link, Third Party Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57347
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/59243
Tags : third-party-advisory
https://www.cert.fi/en/reports/2014/vulnerability788210.html
Tags : Not Applicable, Third Party Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57721
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57968
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
Tags : Broken Link, Vendor Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/59139
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/57966
Tags : third-party-advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/59347
Tags : third-party-advisory
https://sku11army.blogspot.com/2020/01/heartbleed-hearts-continue-to-bleed.html
Tags : Exploit, Permissions Required, Third Party Advisory
cvefind.com 上展示的信息来源于多个精心选择的权威数据源。CVE 数据由 MITRE Corporation 和 National Vulnerability Database (NVD) 提供。已知被利用漏洞（KEV）目录来源于 Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)，EPSS 评分来自 FIRST.org。此外，软件弱点（CWE）和常见攻击模式（CAPEC）数据由 MITRE Corporation 维护，硬件和软件配置（CPE）信息由 NVD 提供。