CVE-2022-49338
02h10 +00:00
CVE 描述
net/mlx5e: CT: Fix cleanup of CT before cleanup of TC ct rules
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: CT: Fix cleanup of CT before cleanup of TC ct rules CT cleanup assumes that all tc rules were deleted first, and so is free to delete the CT shared resources (e.g the dr_action fwd_action which is shared for all tuples). But currently for uplink, this is happens in reverse, causing the below trace. CT cleanup is called from: mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx()->mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx()-> mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup()->mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup()-> mlx5_tc_ct_clean() Only afterwards, tc cleanup is called from: mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx()->mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup() which would have deleted all the tc ct rules, and so delete all the offloaded tuples. Fix this reversing the order of init and on cleanup, which will result in tc cleanup then ct cleanup. [ 9443.593347] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 206774 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c:1882 mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593349] Modules linked in: act_ct nf_flow_table rdma_ucm(O) rdma_cm(O) iw_cm(O) ib_ipoib(O) ib_cm(O) ib_umad(O) mlx5_core(O-) mlxfw(O) mlxdevm(O) auxiliary(O) ib_uverbs(O) psample ib_core(O) mlx_compat(O) ip_gre gre ip_tunnel act_vlan bonding geneve esp6_offload esp6 esp4_offload esp4 act_tunnel_key vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel act_mirred act_skbedit act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo 8021q garp stp ipmi_devintf mrp ipmi_msghandler llc openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat mst_pciconf(O) dm_multipath sbsa_gwdt uio_pdrv_genirq uio mlxbf_pmc mlxbf_pka mlx_trio mlx_bootctl(O) bluefield_edac sch_fq_codel ip_tables ipv6 crc_ccitt btrfs zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor xor_neon raid6_pq raid1 raid0 crct10dif_ce i2c_mlxbf gpio_mlxbf2 mlxbf_gige aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk [last unloaded: mlx5_ib] [ 9443.593419] CPU: 2 PID: 206774 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G O 5.4.0-1023.24.gc14613d-bluefield #1 [ 9443.593422] Hardware name: https://www.mellanox.com BlueField SoC/BlueField SoC, BIOS BlueField:143ebaf Jan 11 2022 [ 9443.593424] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 9443.593489] pc : mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593545] lr : mlx5_ct_fs_smfs_destroy+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593546] sp : ffff8000135dbab0 [ 9443.593548] x29: ffff8000135dbab0 x28: ffff0003a6ab8e80 [ 9443.593550] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffff0003e07d7000 [ 9443.593552] x25: ffff800009609de0 x24: ffff000397fb2120 [ 9443.593554] x23: ffff0003975c0000 x22: 0000000000000000 [ 9443.593556] x21: ffff0003975f08c0 x20: ffff800009609de0 [ 9443.593558] x19: ffff0003c8a13380 x18: 0000000000000014 [ 9443.593560] x17: 0000000067f5f125 x16: 000000006529c620 [ 9443.593561] x15: 000000000000000b x14: 0000000000000000 [ 9443.593563] x13: 0000000000000002 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 9443.593565] x11: ffff800011108868 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 9443.593567] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8000117fb270 [ 9443.593569] x7 : ffff0003ebc01288 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 9443.593571] x5 : ffff800009591ab8 x4 : fffffe000f6d9a20 [ 9443.593572] x3 : 0000000080040001 x2 : fffffe000f6d9a20 [ 9443.593574] x1 : ffff8000095901d8 x0 : 0000000000000025 [ 9443.593577] Call trace: [ 9443.593634] mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593688] mlx5_ct_fs_smfs_destroy+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593743] mlx5_tc_ct_clean+0x34/0xa8 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593797] mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup+0x58/0x88 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593851] mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593905] mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx+0x6c/0x78 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.593959] mlx5e_detach_netdev+0x74/0x98 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.594013] mlx5e_netdev_change_profile+0x70/0x180 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.594067] mlx5e_netdev_attach_nic_profile+0x34/0x40 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.594122] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0x15c/0x1a8 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.594177] mlx5_eswitch_unregister_vport_reps+0x228/0x298 [mlx5_core] [ 9443.594231] mlx5e_rep_remove+0x2c/0x38 ---truncated---CVE 信息
相关弱点
| 弱点名称 | 来源 | |
|---|---|---|
| 暂无信息。 |
指标
| 指标 | 评分 | 严重程度 | CVSS 向量 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V3.1 | 5.5 | MEDIUM |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
更多信息
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Local The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. Low The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. None There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. |
nvd@nist.gov |
EPSS
EPSS 评分
EPSS 百分位
相关产品
配置 0
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 从（含） 5.18 至（不含） 5.18.4
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 5.19
