CWE-358 详情

CWE-358

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Draft
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
指定 CWE 通知
随时了解指定 CWE 的变更。
管理通知

名称: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard

The product does not implement or incorrectly implements one or more security-relevant checks as specified by the design of a standardized algorithm, protocol, or technique.

基本信息

引入方式

Architecture and Design
Implementation

适用平台

编程语言

类: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

常见后果

影响范围 影响 可能性
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism

观察示例

参考资料 描述

CVE-2002-0862

Browser does not verify Basic Constraints of a certificate, even though it is required, allowing spoofing of trusted certificates.

CVE-2002-0970

Browser does not verify Basic Constraints of a certificate, even though it is required, allowing spoofing of trusted certificates.

CVE-2002-1407

Browser does not verify Basic Constraints of a certificate, even though it is required, allowing spoofing of trusted certificates.

CVE-2005-0198

Logic error prevents some required conditions from being enforced during Challenge-Response Authentication Mechanism with MD5 (CRAM-MD5).

CVE-2004-2163

Shared secret not verified in a RADIUS response packet, allowing authentication bypass by spoofing server replies.

CVE-2005-2181

Insufficient verification in VoIP implementation, in violation of standard, allows spoofed messages.

CVE-2005-2182

Insufficient verification in VoIP implementation, in violation of standard, allows spoofed messages.

CVE-2005-2298

Security check not applied to all components, allowing bypass.

检测方法

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

漏洞映射说明

依据 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
备注 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

备注

This is a "missing step" error on the product side, which can overlap weaknesses such as insufficient verification and spoofing. It is frequently found in cryptographic and authentication errors. It is sometimes resultant.

提交记录

名称 组织 日期 发布日期 Version
PLOVER 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

修改记录

名称 组织 日期 备注
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-05-27 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-10-29 +00:00 updated Modes_of_Introduction, Observed_Examples, Other_Notes, Relationship_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2015-12-07 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms
CWE Content Team MITRE 2019-06-20 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2022-04-28 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Detection_Factors