CWE-394
Unexpected Status Code or Return Value
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
00h00 +00:00
指定 CWE 通知
随时了解指定 CWE 的变更。
名称: Unexpected Status Code or Return Value
The product does not properly check when a function or operation returns a value that is legitimate for the function, but is not expected by the product.
基本信息
引入方式
Implementation适用平台
编程语言
类： Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)常见后果
| 影响范围 | 影响 | 可能性 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrity Other | Unexpected State, Alter Execution Logic |
观察示例
| 参考资料 | 描述 |
|---|---|
CVE-2004-1395 | Certain packets (zero byte and other lengths) cause a recvfrom call to produce an unexpected return code that causes a server's listening loop to exit. |
CVE-2002-2124 | Unchecked return code from recv() leads to infinite loop. |
CVE-2005-2553 | Kernel function does not properly handle when a null is returned by a function call, causing it to call another function that it shouldn't. |
CVE-2005-1858 | Memory not properly cleared when read() function call returns fewer bytes than expected. |
CVE-2000-0536 | Bypass access restrictions when connecting from IP whose DNS reverse lookup does not return a hostname. |
CVE-2001-0910 | Bypass access restrictions when connecting from IP whose DNS reverse lookup does not return a hostname. |
CVE-2004-2371 | Game server doesn't check return values for functions that handle text strings and associated size values. |
CVE-2005-1267 | Resultant infinite loop when function call returns -1 value. |
检测方法
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)有效性 : High
漏洞映射说明
依据 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.备注 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
备注
Usually primary, but can be resultant from issues such as behavioral change or API abuse. This can produce resultant vulnerabilities.参考资料
REF-1534
Automated Technical Debt Measure, Version 2OMG.
https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM2/1.0/PDF
提交记录
| 名称 | 组织 | 日期 | 发布日期 | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLOVER | Draft 3 |
修改记录
| 名称 | 组织 | 日期 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Dalci | Cigital | updated Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Other_Notes, Relationship_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Common_Consequences | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Applicable_Platforms, Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Taxonomy_Mappings | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Description | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Relationships, Time_of_Introduction | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Mapping_Notes | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities | |
| CWE Content Team | MITRE | updated References |
