引入方式
Architecture and Design : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Architecture and Design
Implementation
适用平台
编程语言
类: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
常见后果
| 影响范围 |
影响 |
可能性 |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism
注意: Access control checks for specific user data or functionality can be bypassed. | |
| Access Control | Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
注意: Horizontal escalation of privilege is possible (one user can view/modify information of another user). | |
| Access Control | Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
注意: Vertical escalation of privilege is possible if the user-controlled key is actually a flag that indicates administrator status, allowing the attacker to gain administrative access. | |
观察示例
| 参考资料 |
描述 |
| An educational application does not appropriately restrict file IDs to a particular user. The attacker can brute-force guess IDs, indicating IDOR. |
潜在缓解措施
Phases : Architecture and Design
For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Phases : Architecture and Design // Implementation
Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
检测方法
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有效性 : High
漏洞映射说明
依据 : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
备注 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
备注
As of CWE 4.20, the relationship
between IDOR and BOLA needs to be investigated more
closely, including research into how these terms are used
in the industry. The CWE team suspects that IDOR can be a
part of BOLA, but BOLA expands on the weakness inherent to
IDOR in that it is not only about objects that are being
directly referenced.
参考资料
REF-1496
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention Cheat Sheet
OWASP.
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Insecure_Direct_Object_Reference_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html REF-1497
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
MDN.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Attacks/IDOR REF-1498
Insecure Direct Object Reference
Imperva.
https://www.imperva.com/learn/application-security/insecure-direct-object-reference-idor/ REF-1521
Unraveling Vulnerabilities: Understanding the difference between IDOR, BAC and BOLA
Mateus Pantoja.
https://medium.com/@0ta/unraveling-vulnerabilities-understanding-the-difference-between-idor-bac-and-bola-0bc52cbc6dde
提交记录
| 名称 |
组织 |
日期 |
发布日期 |
Version |
| Evgeny Lebanidze |
Cigital |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
Draft 8 |
修改记录
| 名称 |
组织 |
日期 |
备注 |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-03-10 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Alternate_Terms, Applicable_Platforms, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2013-02-21 +00:00 |
updated Alternate_Terms, Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2013-07-17 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Description, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2018-03-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-06-20 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-06-25 +00:00 |
updated Alternate_Terms |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-12-10 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Alternate_Terms |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-02-29 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-04-30 +00:00 |
updated Alternate_Terms, Maintenance_Notes, References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2026-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Time_of_Introduction |