CWE-768 详情

CWE-768

Incorrect Short Circuit Evaluation
2009-05-27
00h00 +00:00
低危
Incomplete
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
指定 CWE 通知
随时了解指定 CWE 的变更。
管理通知

名称: Incorrect Short Circuit Evaluation

The product contains a conditional statement with multiple logical expressions in which one of the non-leading expressions may produce side effects.

基本信息

引入方式

Implementation

适用平台

编程语言

类: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
名称: C (Undetermined)

常见后果

影响范围 影响 可能性
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Varies by Context

注意: Widely varied consequences are possible if an attacker is aware of an unexpected state in the product after a conditional. Usage of short circuit evaluation, though well-defined in the C standard, may alter control flow in a way that introduces logic errors that are difficult to detect, possibly causing errors later during the product's execution. It may lead to information exposure, a system crash, or even complete attacker control of the system.
OtherUnexpected State

注意: This may lead to an unexpected state in the program after the execution of the conditional, because short-circuiting logic may prevent the side effects from occurring.
OtherReduce Maintainability

注意: The usage of short circuit evaluation may decrease the maintainability of the code.

潜在缓解措施

Phases : Implementation
Minimizing the number of statements in a conditional that produce side effects will help to prevent the likelihood of short circuit evaluation to alter control flow in an unexpected way.

检测方法

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
有效性 : High

漏洞映射说明

依据 : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
备注 : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

提交记录

名称 组织 日期 发布日期 Version
CWE Content Team MITRE 2009-03-03 +00:00 2009-05-27 +00:00 1.4

修改记录

名称 组织 日期 备注
CWE Content Team MITRE 2010-09-27 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-09-13 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Likelihood_of_Exploit, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2020-02-24 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-10-26 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Type