CWE-1235 Detail

CWE-1235

Incorrect Use of Autoboxing and Unboxing for Performance Critical Operations
Incomplete
2020-02-24
00h00 +00:00
2025-12-11
00h00 +00:00
Meldingen voor een CWE
Blijf op de hoogte van wijzigingen voor een specifieke CWE.
Meldingen beheren

Naam: Incorrect Use of Autoboxing and Unboxing for Performance Critical Operations

The code uses boxed primitives, which may introduce inefficiencies into performance-critical operations.

Algemene informatie

Achtergrondinformatie

Introductiemodi

Implementation : The programmer may use boxed primitives when not strictly necessary.

Toepasselijke platforms

Taal

Name: Java (Undetermined)
Name: C# (Undetermined)

Besturingssystemen

Class: Not OS-Specific (Undetermined)

Architecturen

Class: Not Architecture-Specific (Undetermined)

Technologieën

Class: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)

Veelvoorkomende gevolgen

Bereik Impact Waarschijnlijkheid
AvailabilityDoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other), Reduce Performance

Note: Incorrect autoboxing/unboxing would result in reduced performance, which sometimes can lead to resource consumption issues, impacting availability when used with generic collections.
Low

Mogelijke risicobeperkingen

Phases : Implementation
Use of boxed primitives should be limited to certain situations such as when calling methods with typed parameters. They should not be used for scientific computing or other performance critical operations. They are only suited to support "impedance mismatch" between reference types and primitives. Examine the use of boxed primitives prior to use. Use SparseArrays or ArrayMap instead of HashMap to avoid performance overhead.

Detectiemethoden

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Notities kwetsbaarheidsmapping

Rechtvaardiging : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Opmerking : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Referenties

REF-1051

Oracle Java Documentation
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/language/autoboxing.html

REF-1052

SEI CERT Oracle Coding Standard for Java : Rule 02. Expressions (EXP)
The Software Engineering Institute.
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/java/EXP04-J.+Do+not+pass+arguments+to+certain+Java+Collections+Framework+methods+that+are+a+different+type+than+the+collection+parameter+type

Indiening

Naam Organisatie Datum Releasedatum Version
Joe Harvey 2019-10-14 +00:00 2020-02-24 +00:00 4.0

Wijzigingen

Naam Organisatie Datum Opmerking
CWE Content Team MITRE 2021-03-15 +00:00 updated Demonstrative_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Description, Detection_Factors, Potential_Mitigations, Weakness_Ordinalities