Execution Flow
1) Explore
[Fingerprinting of the operating system] In order to perform a valid path traversal, the adversary needs to know what the underlying OS is so that the proper file seperator is used.
Technique
- Port mapping. Identify ports that the system is listening on, and attempt to identify inputs and protocol types on those ports.
- TCP/IP Fingerprinting. The adversary uses various software to make connections or partial connections and observe idiosyncratic responses from the operating system. Using those responses, they attempt to guess the actual operating system.
- Induce errors to find informative error messages
2) Explore
[Survey application] Using manual or automated means, an adversary will survey the target application looking for all areas where user input is taken to specify a file name or path.
Technique
- Use a spidering tool to follow and record all links on a web page. Make special note of any links that include parameters in the URL.
- Use a proxy tool to record all links visited during a manual traversal of a web application. Make special note of any links that include parameters in the URL. Manual traversal of this type is frequently necessary to identify forms that are GET method forms rather than POST forms.
- Use a browser to manually explore a website and analyze how it is constructed. Many browser plug-ins are available to facilitate the analysis or automate the URL discovery.
3) Experiment
[Attempt variations on input parameters] Using manual or automated means, an adversary attempts varying relative file path combinations on all found user input locations and observes the responses.
Technique
- Provide "../" or "..\" at the beginning of any filename to traverse to the parent directory
- Use a list of probe strings as path traversal payload. Different strings may be used for different platforms. Strings contain relative path sequences such as "../".
- Use a proxy tool to record results of manual input of relative path traversal probes in known URLs.
4) Exploit
[Access, modify, or execute arbitrary files.] An adversary injects path traversal syntax into identified vulnerable inputs to cause inappropriate reading, writing or execution of files. An adversary could be able to read directories or files which they are normally not allowed to read. The adversary could also access data outside the web document root, or include scripts, source code and other kinds of files from external websites. Once the adversary accesses arbitrary files, they could also modify files. In particular situations, the adversary could also execute arbitrary code or system commands.
Technique
- Manipulate file and its path by injecting relative path sequences (e.g. "../").
- Download files, modify files, or try to execute shell commands (with binary files).
Prerequisites
The target application must accept a string as user input, fail to sanitize combinations of characters in the input that have a special meaning in the context of path navigation, and insert the user-supplied string into path navigation commands.
Skills Required
To inject the malicious payload in a web page
To bypass non trivial filters in the application
Mitigations
Design: Input validation. Assume that user inputs are malicious. Utilize strict type, character, and encoding enforcement
Implementation: Perform input validation for all remote content, including remote and user-generated content.
Implementation: Validate user input by only accepting known good. Ensure all content that is delivered to client is sanitized against an acceptable content specification -- using an allowlist approach.
Implementation: Prefer working without user input when using file system calls
Implementation: Use indirect references rather than actual file names.
Implementation: Use possible permissions on file access when developing and deploying web applications.
Related Weaknesses
CWE-ID |
Weakness Name |
|
Relative Path Traversal The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory. |
References
REF-9
OWASP Testing Guide
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing_for_Path_Traversal_(OWASP-AZ-001) REF-10
WASC Threat Classification 2.0
http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/13246952/Path-Traversal
Submission
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Date release |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2014-06-23 +00:00 |
|
Modifications
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Comment |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2015-11-09 +00:00 |
Updated Attack_Phases |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2015-12-07 +00:00 |
Updated Attack_Phases |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2017-01-09 +00:00 |
Updated Attack_Phases, Related_Weaknesses |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2017-05-01 +00:00 |
Updated Attack_Phases |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2017-08-04 +00:00 |
Updated Attack_Phases |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2018-07-31 +00:00 |
Updated Attack_Motivation-Consequences, Attack_Phases |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2019-04-04 +00:00 |
Updated Consequences |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2020-07-30 +00:00 |
Updated Execution_Flow, Mitigations |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2020-12-17 +00:00 |
Updated References |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2021-10-21 +00:00 |
Updated Execution_Flow |
CAPEC Content Team |
The MITRE Corporation |
2022-09-29 +00:00 |
Updated Example_Instances |