CVE-2024-57897
CVE Descriptions
drm/amdkfd: Correct the migration DMA map direction
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Correct the migration DMA map direction The SVM DMA device map direction should be set the same as the DMA unmap setting, otherwise the DMA core will report the following warning. Before finialize this solution, there're some discussion on the DMA mapping type(stream-based or coherent) in this KFD migration case, followed by https://lore.kernel.org/all/04d4ab32 -45a1-4b88-86ee-fb0f35a0ca40@amd.com/T/. As there's no dma_sync_single_for_*() in the DMA buffer accessed that because this migration operation should be sync properly and automatically. Give that there's might not be a performance problem in various cache sync policy of DMA sync. Therefore, in order to simplify the DMA direction setting alignment, let's set the DMA map direction as BIDIRECTIONAL. [ 150.834218] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1812 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1028 check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930 [ 150.834225] Modules linked in: amdgpu(OE) amdxcp drm_exec(OE) gpu_sched drm_buddy(OE) drm_ttm_helper(OE) ttm(OE) drm_suballoc_helper(OE) drm_display_helper(OE) drm_kms_helper(OE) i2c_algo_bit rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd grace netfs xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat xt_addrtype iptable_filter br_netfilter nvme_fabrics overlay nfnetlink_cttimeout nfnetlink openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c bridge stp llc sch_fq_codel intel_rapl_msr amd_atl intel_rapl_common snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_scodec_component snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg edac_mce_amd snd_pci_acp6x snd_hda_codec snd_acp_config snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_soc_acpi kvm_amd sunrpc snd_pcm kvm binfmt_misc snd_seq_midi crct10dif_pclmul snd_seq_midi_event ghash_clmulni_intel sha512_ssse3 snd_rawmidi nls_iso8859_1 sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 snd_seq aesni_intel snd_seq_device crypto_simd snd_timer cryptd input_leds [ 150.834310] wmi_bmof serio_raw k10temp rapl snd sp5100_tco ipmi_devintf soundcore ccp ipmi_msghandler cm32181 industrialio mac_hid msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore drm(OE) ip_tables x_tables pci_stub crc32_pclmul nvme ahci libahci i2c_piix4 r8169 nvme_core i2c_designware_pci realtek i2c_ccgx_ucsi video wmi hid_generic cdc_ether usbnet usbhid hid r8152 mii [ 150.834354] CPU: 8 PID: 1812 Comm: rocrtst64 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-custom #492 [ 150.834358] Hardware name: AMD Majolica-RN/Majolica-RN, BIOS RMJ1009A 06/13/2021 [ 150.834360] RIP: 0010:check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930 [ 150.834363] Code: c0 4c 89 4d c8 e8 34 bf 86 00 4c 8b 4d c8 4c 8b 45 c0 48 8b 4d b8 48 89 c6 41 57 4c 89 ea 48 c7 c7 80 49 b4 84 e8 b4 81 f3 ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 04 83 ac 84 e8 76 ba fc ff 41 8b 76 4c 49 8d 7e 50 [ 150.834365] RSP: 0018:ffffaac5023739e0 EFLAGS: 00010086 [ 150.834368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8566a2e0 RCX: 0000000000000027 [ 150.834370] RDX: ffff8f6a8f621688 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8f6a8f621680 [ 150.834372] RBP: ffffaac502373a30 R08: 00000000000000c9 R09: ffffaac502373850 [ 150.834373] R10: ffffaac502373848 R11: ffffffff84f46328 R12: ffffaac502373a40 [ 150.834375] R13: ffff8f6741045330 R14: ffff8f6741a77700 R15: ffffffff84ac831b [ 150.834377] FS: 00007faf0fc94c00(0000) GS:ffff8f6a8f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 150.834379] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 150.834381] CR2: 00007faf0b600020 CR3: 000000010a52e000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ 150.834383] Call Trace: [ 150.834385]CVE Informations
Related Weaknesses
| Weakness Name | Source | |
|---|---|---|
| No informations. |
Metrics
| Metrics | Score | Severity | CVSS Vector | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V3.1 | 5.5 | MEDIUM |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
More informations
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Local The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. Low The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. None There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. |
nvd@nist.gov |
EPSS
EPSS Score
EPSS Percentile
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 3.19 To (excluding) 5.15.176
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.16 To (excluding) 6.1.124
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.2 To (excluding) 6.6.70
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.7 To (excluding) 6.12.9
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.13
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.13
