CVE Descriptions
mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: fix PM resume warning
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: fix PM resume warning Fixed warning on PM resume as shown below caused due to uninitialized struct nand_operation that checks chip select field : WARN_ON(op->cs >= nanddev_ntargets(&chip->base) [ 14.588522] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 14.588529] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1392 at drivers/mtd/nand/raw/internals.h:139 nand_reset_op+0x1e0/0x1f8 [ 14.588553] Modules linked in: bdc udc_core [ 14.588579] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1392 Comm: rtcwake Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc4-g5394eea10651 #16 [ 14.588590] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 14.588593] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 14.588598] Call trace: [ 14.588604] dump_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c [ 14.588622] r7:00000009 r6:0000008b r5:60000153 r4:c0fa558c [ 14.588625] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x7c [ 14.588639] dump_stack_lvl from dump_stack+0x18/0x1c [ 14.588653] r5:c08d40b0 r4:c1003cb0 [ 14.588656] dump_stack from __warn+0x84/0xe4 [ 14.588668] __warn from warn_slowpath_fmt+0x18c/0x194 [ 14.588678] r7:c08d40b0 r6:c1003cb0 r5:00000000 r4:00000000 [ 14.588681] warn_slowpath_fmt from nand_reset_op+0x1e0/0x1f8 [ 14.588695] r8:70c40dff r7:89705f41 r6:36b4a597 r5:c26c9444 r4:c26b0048 [ 14.588697] nand_reset_op from brcmnand_resume+0x13c/0x150 [ 14.588714] r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:c24f8010 r6:c228a3f8 r5:c26c94bc r4:c26b0040 [ 14.588717] brcmnand_resume from platform_pm_resume+0x34/0x54 [ 14.588735] r5:00000010 r4:c0840a50 [ 14.588738] platform_pm_resume from dpm_run_callback+0x5c/0x14c [ 14.588757] dpm_run_callback from device_resume+0xc0/0x324 [ 14.588776] r9:c24f8054 r8:c24f80a0 r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:00000010 r4:c24f8010 [ 14.588779] device_resume from dpm_resume+0x130/0x160 [ 14.588799] r9:c22539e4 r8:00000010 r7:c22bebb0 r6:c24f8010 r5:c22539dc r4:c22539b0 [ 14.588802] dpm_resume from dpm_resume_end+0x14/0x20 [ 14.588822] r10:c2204e40 r9:00000000 r8:c228a3fc r7:00000000 r6:00000003 r5:c228a414 [ 14.588826] r4:00000010 [ 14.588828] dpm_resume_end from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x274/0x6f8 [ 14.588848] r5:c228a414 r4:00000000 [ 14.588851] suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x228/0x2bc [ 14.588868] r10:c3502910 r9:c3501f40 r8:00000004 r7:c228a438 r6:c0f95e18 r5:00000000 [ 14.588871] r4:00000003 [ 14.588874] pm_suspend from state_store+0x74/0xd0 [ 14.588889] r7:c228a438 r6:c0f934c8 r5:00000003 r4:00000003 [ 14.588892] state_store from kobj_attr_store+0x1c/0x28 [ 14.588913] r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:f09f9f08 r6:00000004 r5:c3502900 r4:c0283250 [ 14.588916] kobj_attr_store from sysfs_kf_write+0x40/0x4c [ 14.588936] r5:c3502900 r4:c0d92a48 [ 14.588939] sysfs_kf_write from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x104/0x1f0 [ 14.588956] r5:c3502900 r4:c3501f40 [ 14.588960] kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x250/0x420 [ 14.588980] r10:c0e14b48 r9:00000000 r8:c25f5780 r7:00443398 r6:f09f9f68 r5:c34f7f00 [ 14.588983] r4:c042a88c [ 14.588987] vfs_write from ksys_write+0x74/0xe4 [ 14.589005] r10:00000004 r9:c25f5780 r8:c02002fA0 r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:c34f7f00 [ 14.589008] r4:c34f7f00 [ 14.589011] ksys_write from sys_write+0x10/0x14 [ 14.589029] r7:00000004 r6:004421c0 r5:00443398 r4:00000004 [ 14.589032] sys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x5c [ 14.589044] Exception stack(0xf09f9fa8 to 0xf09f9ff0) [ 14.589050] 9fa0: 00000004 00443398 00000004 00443398 00000004 00000001 [ 14.589056] 9fc0: 00000004 00443398 004421c0 00000004 b6ecbd58 00000008 bebfbc38 0043eb78 [ 14.589062] 9fe0: 00440eb0 bebfbaf8 b6de18a0 b6e579e8 [ 14.589065] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The fix uses the higher level nand_reset(chip, chipnr); where chipnr = 0, when doing PM resume operation in compliance with the controller support for single die nand chip. Switching from nand_reset_op() to nan ---truncated---CVE Informations
Related Weaknesses
| Weakness Name | Source | |
|---|---|---|
| No informations. |
Metrics
| Metrics | Score | Severity | CVSS Vector | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V3.1 | 7.8 | HIGH |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
More informations
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Local The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. Low The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. High There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. |
nvd@nist.gov |
EPSS
EPSS Score
EPSS Percentile
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 4.16 To (excluding) 5.4.293
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.5 To (excluding) 5.10.237
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.11 To (excluding) 5.15.181
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.16 To (excluding) 6.1.135
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.2 To (excluding) 6.6.88
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.7 To (excluding) 6.12.24
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.13 To (excluding) 6.13.12
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.14 To (excluding) 6.14.3
Configuraton 0
Debian>>Debian_linux >> Version 11.0
References
Tags : Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
Tags : Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
