CVE Descriptions

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: macb: fix use-after-free access to PTP clock PTP clock is registered on every opening of the interface and destroyed on every closing. However it may be accessed via get_ts_info ethtool call which is possible while the interface is just present in the kernel. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ptp_clock_index+0x47/0x50 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:426 Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880194345cc by task syz.0.6/948 CPU: 1 PID: 948 Comm: syz.0.6 Not tainted 6.1.164+ #109 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.1-0-g3208b098f51a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xba lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:316 [inline] print_report+0x17f/0x496 mm/kasan/report.c:420 kasan_report+0xd9/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:524 ptp_clock_index+0x47/0x50 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:426 gem_get_ts_info+0x138/0x1e0 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:3349 macb_get_ts_info+0x68/0xb0 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:3371 __ethtool_get_ts_info+0x17c/0x260 net/ethtool/common.c:558 ethtool_get_ts_info net/ethtool/ioctl.c:2367 [inline] __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3017 [inline] dev_ethtool+0x2b05/0x6290 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3095 dev_ioctl+0x637/0x1070 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:510 sock_do_ioctl+0x20d/0x2c0 net/socket.c:1215 sock_ioctl+0x577/0x6d0 net/socket.c:1320 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18c/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:76 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Allocated by task 457: kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:563 [inline] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:699 [inline] ptp_clock_register+0x144/0x10e0 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:235 gem_ptp_init+0x46f/0x930 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c:375 macb_open+0x901/0xd10 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:2920 __dev_open+0x2ce/0x500 net/core/dev.c:1501 __dev_change_flags+0x56a/0x740 net/core/dev.c:8651 dev_change_flags+0x92/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8722 do_setlink+0xaf8/0x3a80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:2833 __rtnl_newlink+0xbf4/0x1940 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3608 rtnl_newlink+0x63/0xa0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3655 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3c6/0xed0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6150 netlink_rcv_skb+0x15d/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2511 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x6d7/0xa30 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344 netlink_sendmsg+0x97e/0xeb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1872 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:718 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x14b/0x180 net/socket.c:730 __sys_sendto+0x320/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2152 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2164 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2160 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2160 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:76 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Freed by task 938: kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1729 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook mm/slub.c:1755 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:3687 [inline] __kmem_cache_free+0xbc/0x320 mm/slub.c:3700 device_release+0xa0/0x240 drivers/base/core.c:2507 kobject_cleanup lib/kobject.c:681 [inline] kobject_release lib/kobject.c:712 [inline] kref_put include/linux/kref.h:65 [inline] kobject_put+0x1cd/0x350 lib/kobject.c:729 put_device+0x1b/0x30 drivers/base/core.c:3805 ptp_clock_unregister+0x171/0x270 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:391 gem_ptp_remove+0x4e/0x1f0 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c:404 macb_close+0x1c8/0x270 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:2966 __dev_close_many+0x1b9/0x310 net/core/dev.c:1585 __dev_close net/core/dev.c:1597 [inline] __dev_change_flags+0x2bb/0x740 net/core/dev.c:8649 dev_change_fl ---truncated---

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID	Weakness Name	Source
CWE-416	Use After Free The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.

Metrics

Metrics	Score	Severity	CVSS Vector	Source
V3.1	7.8	HIGH	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H More informations Base: Exploitabilty Metrics The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Local The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. Low The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope Metrics The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact Metrics The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. High There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal Metrics The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental Metrics These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.	416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

EPSS First.org