CVE-2024-58056
CVE Descriptions
remoteproc: core: Fix ida_free call while not allocated
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: remoteproc: core: Fix ida_free call while not allocated In the rproc_alloc() function, on error, put_device(&rproc->dev) is called, leading to the call of the rproc_type_release() function. An error can occurs before ida_alloc is called. In such case in rproc_type_release(), the condition (rproc->index >= 0) is true as rproc->index has been initialized to 0. ida_free() is called reporting a warning: [ 4.181906] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 24 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x100/0x164 [ 4.186378] stm32-display-dsi 5a000000.dsi: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/dsi@5a000000/panel@0 [ 4.188854] ida_free called for id=0 which is not allocated. [ 4.198256] mipi-dsi 5a000000.dsi.0: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/dsi@5a000000 [ 4.203556] Modules linked in: panel_orisetech_otm8009a dw_mipi_dsi_stm(+) gpu_sched dw_mipi_dsi stm32_rproc stm32_crc32 stm32_ipcc(+) optee(+) [ 4.224307] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 24 Comm: kworker/u10:0 Not tainted 6.12.0 #442 [ 4.231481] Hardware name: STM32 (Device Tree Support) [ 4.236627] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 4.242504] Call trace: [ 4.242522] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 [ 4.250218] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x64 [ 4.255274] dump_stack_lvl from __warn+0x80/0x12c [ 4.260134] __warn from warn_slowpath_fmt+0x114/0x188 [ 4.265199] warn_slowpath_fmt from ida_free+0x100/0x164 [ 4.270565] ida_free from rproc_type_release+0x38/0x60 [ 4.275832] rproc_type_release from device_release+0x30/0xa0 [ 4.281601] device_release from kobject_put+0xc4/0x294 [ 4.286762] kobject_put from rproc_alloc.part.0+0x208/0x28c [ 4.292430] rproc_alloc.part.0 from devm_rproc_alloc+0x80/0xc4 [ 4.298393] devm_rproc_alloc from stm32_rproc_probe+0xd0/0x844 [stm32_rproc] [ 4.305575] stm32_rproc_probe [stm32_rproc] from platform_probe+0x5c/0xbc Calling ida_alloc earlier in rproc_alloc ensures that the rproc->index is properly set.CVE Informations
Related Weaknesses
| Weakness Name | Source | |
|---|---|---|
| No informations. |
Metrics
| Metrics | Score | Severity | CVSS Vector | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V3.1 | 5.5 | MEDIUM |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
More informations
Base: Exploitabilty MetricsThe Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component. Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. Local The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. Low The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component. None The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user. Base: Scope MetricsThe Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope. Scope Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Base: Impact MetricsThe Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve. Confidentiality Impact This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. None There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component. Integrity Impact This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability Impact This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. High There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable). Temporal MetricsThe Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability. Environmental MetricsThese metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. |
nvd@nist.gov |
EPSS
EPSS Score
EPSS Percentile
Products Mentioned
Configuraton 0
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.0 To (excluding) 6.1.129
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.2 To (excluding) 6.6.76
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.7 To (excluding) 6.12.13
Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.13 To (excluding) 6.13.2
