Modes Of Introduction
Implementation
Applicable Platforms
Language
Class: Not Language-Specific (Often)
Common Consequences
| Scope |
Impact |
Likelihood |
| Other | Varies by Context | |
Observed Examples
| References |
Description |
| large ID in packet used as array index |
| negative array index as argument to POP LIST command |
Potential Mitigations
Phases : Implementation
Detection Methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness : High
Vulnerability Mapping Notes
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Comment : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Notes
This entry is still under development and will continue to see updates and content improvements.
Submission
| Name |
Organization |
Date |
Date release |
Version |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-06-24 +00:00 |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
4.1 |
Modifications
| Name |
Organization |
Date |
Comment |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-03-15 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Weakness_Ordinalities |