Informations de base
Nonces are often bundled with a key in a communication exchange to produce a new session key for each exchange.
Modes d'introduction
Architecture and Design : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Plateformes applicables
Langue
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Conséquences courantes
| Portée |
Impact |
Probabilité |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Note: Potentially a replay attack, in which an attacker could send the same data twice, could be crafted if nonces are allowed to be reused. This could allow a user to send a message which masquerades as a valid message from a valid user. | |
Mesures d’atténuation potentielles
Phases : Implementation
Refuse to reuse nonce values.
Phases : Implementation
Use techniques such as requiring incrementing, time based and/or challenge response to assure uniqueness of nonces.
Méthodes de détection
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Références
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
Soumission
| Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Date de publication |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Modifications
| Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Commentaire |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Background_Details, Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-06-20 +00:00 |
updated Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Type |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |