Modes d'introduction
Implementation
Plateformes applicables
Langue
Name: C (Undetermined)
Name: C++ (Undetermined)
Conséquences courantes
| Portée |
Impact |
Probabilité |
Integrity Confidentiality Availability | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Note: It may be possible to execute arbitrary code through the use of a write-what-where condition. | |
| Integrity | Modify Memory, Modify Application Data
Note: Signal race conditions often result in data corruption. | |
Exemples observés
| Références |
Description |
| signal handler calls function that ultimately uses malloc() |
| SIGCHLD signal to FTP server can cause crash under heavy load while executing non-reentrant functions like malloc/free. |
Mesures d’atténuation potentielles
Phases : Requirements
Require languages or libraries that provide reentrant functionality, or otherwise make it easier to avoid this weakness.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Design signal handlers to only set flags rather than perform complex functionality.
Phases : Implementation
Ensure that non-reentrant functions are not found in signal handlers.
Phases : Implementation
Use sanity checks to reduce the timing window for exploitation of race conditions. This is only a partial solution, since many attacks might fail, but other attacks still might work within the narrower window, even accidentally.
Méthodes de détection
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Efficacité : High
Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Références
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf REF-62
The Art of Software Security Assessment
Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh.
Soumission
| Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Date de publication |
Version |
| CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Modifications
| Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Commentaire |
| Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-11-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-09-27 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Observed_Examples, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-27 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-09-13 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-10-30 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Description, References, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-12-10 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Weakness_Ordinalities |