Modes d'introduction
Architecture and Design : COMMISSION: This weakness refers to an incorrect design related to an architectural security tactic.
Implementation
Plateformes applicables
Langue
Name: SQL (Often)
Technologies
Name: Database Server (Often)
Conséquences courantes
Portée |
Impact |
Probabilité |
Confidentiality Integrity Access Control | Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Bypass Protection Mechanism | |
Mesures d’atténuation potentielles
Phases : Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use a standard input validation mechanism to validate all input for length, type, syntax, and business rules before accepting the data. Use an "accept known good" validation strategy.
Phases : Implementation
Use a parameterized query AND make sure that the accepted values conform to the business rules. Construct your SQL statement accordingly.
Méthodes de détection
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Efficacité : High
Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Soumission
Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Date de publication |
Version |
Anonymous Tool Vendor (under NDA) |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Modifications
Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Commentaire |
Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-07-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Description |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Name |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2021-10-28 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2024-02-29 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-04-03 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms |