Modes d'introduction
Implementation : REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Operation
Plateformes applicables
Langue
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)
Technologies
Name: Web Server (Undetermined)
Conséquences courantes
| Portée |
Impact |
Probabilité |
| Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism
Note: An attacker may be able to bypass the authorization mechanism to gain access to the otherwise-protected URL. | |
| Confidentiality | Read Files or Directories
Note: If a non-canonical URL is used, the server may choose to return the contents of the file, instead of pre-processing the file (e.g. as a program). | |
Mesures d’atténuation potentielles
Phases : Architecture and Design
Make access control policy based on path information in canonical form. Use very restrictive regular expressions to validate that the path is in the expected form.
Phases : Architecture and Design
Reject all alternate path encodings that are not in the expected canonical form.
Méthodes de détection
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Efficacité : High
Notes de cartographie des vulnérabilités
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Commentaire : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Soumission
| Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Date de publication |
Version |
| Evgeny Lebanidze |
Cigital |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
2008-01-30 +00:00 |
Draft 8 |
Modifications
| Nom |
Organisation |
Date |
Commentaire |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-10-14 +00:00 |
updated Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-12-13 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-03-29 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Enabling_Factors_for_Exploitation, Modes_of_Introduction, Observed_Examples, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-01-31 +00:00 |
updated Description |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
| CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2025-12-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities |