CWE-356 Detalhe

CWE-356

Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action
2006-07-19
00h00 +00:00
Incomplete
2026-10-28
00h00 +00:00
Notificações para um CWE
Fique informado sobre quaisquer alterações para um CWE específico.
Gerenciar notificações

Nome: Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action

The product encounters a situation in which some of its behavior is security-critical and should be authorized by a human before progressing, but it does not properly consult with the human user or its proxy (such as UI approval dialogues or pre-set policies) to determine whether it is allowed to perform the potentially dangerous behavior.

Informações Gerais

Modos de Introdução

Architecture and Design : The architecture or design might include a component or potentially dangerous functionality that could effectively act independently.
Implementation : A bug in the implementation could cause the product to fail to recognize that it is about to perform a dangerous operation requiring a human decision.

Plataformas Aplicáveis

Linguagem

Classe: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined)

Arquiteturas

Classe: Not Architecture-Specific (Undetermined)

Tecnologias

Nome: AI/ML (Undetermined)
Classe: Not Technology-Specific (Undetermined)

Consequências Comuns

Escopo Impacto Probabilidade
Non-RepudiationHide Activities

Nota: This makes it easier for attackers to trick users into inflicting damage to their system.

Exemplos Observados

Referências Descrição

CVE-2000-0788

Document editor runs macros without asking for user approval.

CVE-2003-0660

OS does not prompt the user to download and install ActiveX controls when the system is low on memory.

CVE-2008-2540

Chain: Web browser does not prompt the user before downloading an object that has an unrecognized content type (CWE-356), leading to untrusted search path (CWE-426) on a different OS.

CVE-2026-10591

AI agentic IDE product for cloud service does not consult the "Human-in-the-Loop" (HITL) in some security-critical decisions, allowing rewrite of its own Model Context Protocol (MCP), leading to configuration change and code execution [REF-1582].

CVE-2026-33068

AI agentic coding tool trusts a potentially-untrusted configuration input, causing it to skip a "trust confirmation dialog" before conducting potentially dangerous actions.

CVE-2025-59828

Chain: AI agentic coding tool auto-executes Yarn plugins in untrusted directories (CWE-696) before asking the user to approve the action (CWE-356).

CVE-1999-1055

Product does not warn user when document contains certain dangerous functions or macros.

CVE-1999-0794

Product does not warn user when document contains certain dangerous functions or macros.

CVE-2000-0277

Product does not warn user when document contains certain dangerous functions or macros.

CVE-2000-0517

Product does not warn user about a certificate if it has already been accepted for a different site. Possibly resultant.

CVE-2005-0602

File extractor does not warn user if setuid/setgid files could be extracted. Overlaps privileges/permissions.

CVE-2000-0342

Chain: E-mail client allows bypass of warning for dangerous attachments (CWE-356) via a Windows .LNK file that refers to the attachment (CWE-64).

Mitigações Potenciais

Phases : Architecture and Design
Product systems should warn users that a potentially dangerous action may occur if the user proceeds. For example, if the user downloads a file from an unknown source and attempts to execute the file on their machine, then the application's GUI can indicate that the file is unsafe.

Notas de Mapeamento de Vulnerabilidade

Justificativa : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Comentário : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

Notas

Often resultant, e.g. in unhandled error conditions.
Can overlap privilege errors, conceptually at least.

Referências

REF-1582

When the AI Edits Its Own Trust Boundary: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in AWS's Agentic IDE
Nicole Fishbein, Eran Segal.
https://www.kodemsecurity.com/resources/aws-kiro-agentic-ide-rce-prompt-injection-mcp-config-vulnerability

REF-1583

Human-in-the-loop
LangChain.
https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/human-in-the-loop

REF-1584

Human-in-the-loop
Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-in-the-loop

Submissão

Nome Organização Data Data de lançamento Version
PLOVER 2006-07-19 +00:00 2006-07-19 +00:00 Draft 3

Modificações

Nome Organização Data Comentário
Eric Dalci Cigital 2008-07-01 +00:00 updated Time_of_Introduction
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-09-08 +00:00 updated Relationships, Relationship_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
CWE Content Team MITRE 2008-10-14 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2011-06-01 +00:00 updated Common_Consequences
CWE Content Team MITRE 2012-05-11 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2014-07-30 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2017-11-08 +00:00 updated Applicable_Platforms
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-01-31 +00:00 updated Description
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-04-27 +00:00 updated Relationships
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-06-29 +00:00 updated Mapping_Notes
CWE Content Team MITRE 2023-10-26 +00:00 updated Observed_Examples
CWE Content Team MITRE 2025-12-11 +00:00 updated Weakness_Ordinalities
CWE Content Team MITRE 2026-10-28 +00:00 updated Alternate_Terms, Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Description, Modes_of_Introduction, Name, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships